Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBrown, Z
dc.contributor.authorEdworthy, Judy
dc.contributor.authorSneyd, John
dc.contributor.authorSchlesinger, J
dc.date.accessioned2015-07-28T12:52:13Z
dc.date.available2015-07-28T12:52:13Z
dc.date.issued2015-06-05
dc.identifier.issn0003-6870
dc.identifier.issn1872-9126
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10026.1/3471
dc.descriptionFile replaced (incorrect version) on 29/7/2022 by KT (LDS).
dc.description.abstract

This study compared the ability of forty anaesthetists to judge absolute levels of oxygen saturation, direction of change, and size of change in saturation using auditory pitch and pitch difference in two laboratory-based studies that compared a linear pitch scale with a logarithmic scale. In the former the differences in saturation become perceptually closer as the oxygenation level becomes higher whereas in the latter the pitch differences are perceptually equivalent across the whole range of values. The results show that anaesthetist participants produce significantly more accurate judgements of both absolute oxygenation values and size of oxygenation level difference when a logarithmic, rather than a linear, scale is used. The line of best fit for the logarithmic function was also closer to x ¼ y than for the linear function. The results of these studies can inform the development and standardisation of pulse oximetry tones in order to improve patient safety.

dc.format.extent350-357
dc.format.mediumPrint-Electronic
dc.languageen
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherElsevier BV
dc.subjectPulse oximetry
dc.subjectPatient monitoring
dc.subjectPatient safety
dc.subjectAuditory perception
dc.titleA comparison of linear and logarithmic auditory tones in pulse oximeters
dc.typejournal-article
dc.typeArticle
plymouth.author-urlhttps://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000358389100035&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=11bb513d99f797142bcfeffcc58ea008
plymouth.volume51
plymouth.publication-statusPublished
plymouth.journalApplied Ergonomics
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.apergo.2015.06.006
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Health
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Research Groups
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Research Groups/Centre for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour (CBCB)
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Research Groups/Centre for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour (CBCB)/Behaviour
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Users by role
dc.publisher.placeEngland
dcterms.dateAccepted2015-06-05
dc.identifier.eissn1872-9126
dc.rights.embargoperiodNot known
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1016/j.apergo.2015.06.006
rioxxterms.licenseref.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


All items in PEARL are protected by copyright law.
Author manuscripts deposited to comply with open access mandates are made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the details provided on the item record or document. In the absence of an open licence (e.g. Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher or author.
Theme by 
Atmire NV