Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBobic, Nikolina
dc.date.accessioned2015-07-22T12:30:00Z
dc.date.available2015-07-22T12:30:00Z
dc.date.issued2015-12-17
dc.identifier.issn1033-1867
dc.identifier.issn2164-4756
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10026.1/3452
dc.description.abstract

One significant aspect of military interventions is that violence in binary geographies, which have an implied colonial discourse (such as Serbia), often involve the dialectics of construction and erasure, meaning that absence and presence of destruction and violence run side by side. This paper investigates the ways that technology and media were instrumentalised in miniaturising evidence and reducing the visibility of destruction during NATO’s Operation Allied Force in Serbia and Kosovo. While the dominant NATO rhetoric behind the intervention was “humanitarian” with the Operation being deployed in the name of Western values and civilisation, this text puts forward an alternative argument. The 1999 intervention was a war machine where the military-industrial-media-entertainment network restricted the public gaze and the control of information as well as made it nearly impossible to distinguish information from disinformation, and fact from fiction. Its value was predicated on expressing and showing less of the violence in order to set up a clear representation of a perpetrator and a victim. Thus, the reconceptualisation of borders in relation to 1999 was contingent on the deployment of the infrastructure of satellites and unmanned drones in an attempt to, firstly, miniaturise the weapon and, secondly, de-familiarise the military frame with spectacular speed.

dc.format.extent398-416
dc.languageen
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherTaylor and Francis
dc.subjectViolence Research
dc.subject16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
dc.titleWar Machine: Media and Technology during Operation Allied Force
dc.typejournal-article
dc.typeArticle
plymouth.editionThe Architecture of Border Thinking
plymouth.issue3
plymouth.volume25
plymouth.publication-statusPublished
plymouth.journalFabrications
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/10331867.2015.1077549
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Arts, Humanities and Business
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Arts, Humanities and Business/School of Art, Design and Architecture
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA/UoA13 Architecture, Built Environment and Planning
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Users by role
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Users by role/Academics
dc.identifier.eissn2164-4756
dc.rights.embargoperiodNot known
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1080/10331867.2015.1077549
rioxxterms.licenseref.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


All items in PEARL are protected by copyright law.
Author manuscripts deposited to comply with open access mandates are made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the details provided on the item record or document. In the absence of an open licence (e.g. Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher or author.
Theme by 
Atmire NV