Show simple item record

dc.contributor.supervisorEvans, Jonathan
dc.contributor.authorMcKenzie, Rebecca Kate
dc.contributor.otherFaculty of Science and Engineeringen_US
dc.date.accessioned2011-01-07T15:11:26Z
dc.date.available2011-01-07T15:11:26Z
dc.date.issued2010
dc.date.issued2010
dc.identifier10068137en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10026.1/304
dc.description.abstract

Reasoning from all knowledge and belief is an adaptive approach to thinking about the world. It has been robustly shown that conditional ‘if then’ reasoning with everyday content is influenced by the background knowledge an individual has available. If we are presented with the statement ‘if it rains, then John will get wet’ then we are told that it is raining and asked if John will get wet, we may consider a number of possibilities before answering the question; perhaps John has an umbrella or is sheltered from the rain. Hence, when engaged in conditional reasoning of this sort people typically draw on background knowledge to arrive at an informed response. People with autism tend not to process information in context. There is a wealth of evidence indicating that these individuals have a piecemeal rather than an integrative processing style. It was therefore hypothesised that adolescents with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) would be less influenced by background knowledge when engaged in conditional reasoning with everyday content. Adolescents with ASD showed a weak or absent effect of available background knowledge on reasoning outcomes compared to a typically developing control group. This finding was demonstrated in two separate conditional reasoning tasks. These results were not explained by a failure to generate background knowledge or by differences in the beliefs held by the two groups regarding problem content. Within the typical population a lack of contextualised reasoning was also found among participants with high scores on one particular autistic trait, attention to detail. The ability to integrate all relevant information during conditional reasoning was also found to be dependent on available working memory resources. These results extend the known domains which demonstrate a lack of contextualised processing in autism. They also show that for individuals with autism reasoning without regard for background knowledge stems from a failure to integrate information. The findings suggest that this failure is related to the cognitive demands of the task and the processing style of the individual.

en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherUniversity of Plymouthen_US
dc.subjectConditional
dc.subjectAutism
dc.subjectIntegration
dc.subjectCounterexamples
dc.subjectReasoningen_US
dc.titleConditional reasoning in autism spectrum disorder: activation and integration of knowledge and belief.en_US
dc.typeThesis
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.24382/4700


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


All items in PEARL are protected by copyright law.
Author manuscripts deposited to comply with open access mandates are made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the details provided on the item record or document. In the absence of an open licence (e.g. Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher or author.
Theme by 
Atmire NV