Show simple item record

dc.contributor.supervisorStevenson, Kim
dc.contributor.authorChanning, Iain Christopher Edward
dc.contributor.otherFaculty of Arts, Humanities and Businessen_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-02-25T11:33:26Z
dc.date.available2014-02-25T11:33:26Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.identifier10128808en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10026.1/2897
dc.description.abstract

While domestic fascism within the United Kingdom has never critically challenged Parliamentary sovereignty, it has decisively disrupted public order since its roots were established in the inter-war political scene. The violence provoked by Sir Oswald Mosley’s British Union of Fascists (BUF) was one of the stimulating factors behind the enactment of the Public Order Act 1936. This Act significantly strengthened the powers of the police to regulate or proscribe varies forms of political activism. This thesis analyses the legal responses of Parliament, the police and the judiciary to interwar British fascism. In addition, by analysing the legal responses to public disorder from before and after the 1930s, it positions the BUF within their wider historical context which enables this thesis to assess and evaluate consistencies and discrepancies within the application of the law. By enhancing the historical contextualisation of the period with a critical legal lens, the principal forms of fascist propaganda are evaluated, including public processions, public meetings and the wearing of political uniform. It is argued that the application of a historico-legal methodology challenges the perception that the authorities were inherently politically biased. This thesis explores alternative factors which explain why the responses of the legal authorities appeared inconsistent in their approach to the far-Right and the far-Left. In order to critically analyse the police’s decision making process when monitoring political activism, the limitations of public order law and the nature of police discretion itself become fundamental components which offer a more balanced explanation for the appearance of political partiality within the police force.

en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherUniversity of Plymouthen_US
dc.subjectFascismen_US
dc.subjectBritish Union of Fascistsen_US
dc.subjectPublic Order Lawen_US
dc.subjectPoliceen_US
dc.subjectPolitical Activismen_US
dc.subjectPolitical Extremismen_US
dc.subjectPublic Order Act 1936en_US
dc.subjectPolitical Violenceen_US
dc.subjectBreach of the Peaceen_US
dc.titleBlackshirts and White Wigs: Reflections on Public Order Law and the Political Activism of the British Union of Fascistsen_US
dc.typeThesis
plymouth.versionEdited versionen_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.24382/4837


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


All items in PEARL are protected by copyright law.
Author manuscripts deposited to comply with open access mandates are made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the details provided on the item record or document. In the absence of an open licence (e.g. Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher or author.
Theme by 
Atmire NV