Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorRoland, Men
dc.contributor.authorRoberts, Men
dc.contributor.authorRhenius, Ven
dc.contributor.authorCampbell, Jen
dc.date.accessioned2014-01-29T11:15:59Z
dc.date.available2014-01-29T11:15:59Z
dc.date.issued2013-10-20en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10026.1/2870
dc.description.abstract

BACKGROUND: The General Practice Assessment Questionnaire (GPAQ) has been widely used to assess patient experience in general practice in the UK since 2004. In 2013, new regulations were introduced by the General Medical Council (GMC) requiring UK doctors to undertake periodic revalidation, which includes assessment of patient experience for individual doctors. We describe the development of a new version of GPAQ - GPAQ-R which addresses the GMC's requirements for revalidation as well as additional NHS requirements for surveys that GPs may need to carry out in their own practices. METHODS: Questionnaires were given out by doctors or practice staff after routine consultations in line with the guidance given by the General Medical Council for surveys to be used for revalidation. Data analysis and practice reports were provided independently. RESULTS: Data were analysed for questionnaires from 7258 patients relating to 164 GPs in 29 general practices. Levels of missing data were generally low (typically 4.5-6%). The number of returned questionnaires required to achieve reliability of 0.7 were around 35 for individual doctor communication items and 29 for a composite score based on doctor communication items. This suggests that the responses to GPAQ-R had similar reliability to the GMC's own questionnaire and we recommend 30 completed GPAQ-R questionnaires are sufficient for revalidation purposes. However, where an initial screen raises concern, the survey might be repeated with 50 completed questionnaires in order to increase reliability. CONCLUSIONS: GPAQ-R is a development of a well-established patient experience questionnaire used in general practice in the UK since 2004. This new version can be recommended for use in order to meet the UK General Medical Council's requirements for surveys to be used in revalidation of doctors. It also meets the needs of GPs to ask about patient experience relating to aspects of practice care that are not specific to individual general practitioners (e.g. receptionists, telephone access) which meet other survey requirements of the National Health Service in England. Use of GPAQ-R has the potential to reduce the number of surveys that GPs need to carry out in their practices to meet the various regulatory requirements which they face.

en
dc.format.extent160 - ?en
dc.languageengen
dc.language.isoengen
dc.subjectAgeden
dc.subjectAttitude to Healthen
dc.subjectCommunicationen
dc.subjectFactor Analysis, Statisticalen
dc.subjectFemaleen
dc.subjectGeneral Practiceen
dc.subjectHumansen
dc.subjectMaleen
dc.subjectMiddle Ageden
dc.subjectPatient Satisfactionen
dc.subjectPhysician-Patient Relationsen
dc.subjectPsychometricsen
dc.subjectQuality Assurance, Health Careen
dc.subjectReproducibility of Resultsen
dc.subjectSurveys and Questionnairesen
dc.subjectUnited Kingdomen
dc.titleGPAQ-R: development and psychometric properties of a version of the general practice assessment questionnaire for use for revalidation by general practitioners in the UK.en
dc.typeJournal Article
plymouth.author-urlhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24138508en
plymouth.volume14en
plymouth.publication-statusPublished onlineen
plymouth.journalBMC Fam Practen
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/1471-2296-14-160en
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA/UoA23 Education
dc.publisher.placeEnglanden
dcterms.dateAccepted2013-10-16en
dc.identifier.eissn1471-2296en
dc.rights.embargoperiodNot knownen
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1186/1471-2296-14-160en
rioxxterms.licenseref.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserveden
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2013-10-20en
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


All items in PEARL are protected by copyright law.
Author manuscripts deposited to comply with open access mandates are made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the details provided on the item record or document. In the absence of an open licence (e.g. Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher or author.
Theme by 
Atmire NV