Show simple item record

dc.contributor.supervisorHandley, Simon J
dc.contributor.authorTrippas, Dries
dc.contributor.otherFaculty of Science and Engineeringen_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-01-02T16:05:14Z
dc.date.available2014-01-02T16:05:14Z
dc.date.issued2013
dc.identifier10254843en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10026.1/2853
dc.description.abstract

The aim of this dissertation was to address a theoretical debate on belief bias. Belief bias is the tendency for people to be influenced by their prior beliefs when engaged in deductive reasoning. Deduction is the act of drawing necessary conclusions from premises which are meant to be assumed as true. Given that the logical validity of an argument is independent of its content, being influenced by your prior beliefs in such content is considered a bias. Traditional theories posit there are two belief bias components. Motivated reasoning is the tendency to reason better for arguments with unbelievable conclusions relative to arguments with believable conclusions. Response bias is the tendency to accept believable arguments and to reject unbelievable arguments. Dube et al. (2010) pointed out critical methodological problems that undermine evidence for traditional theories. Using signal detection theory (SDT), they found evidence for response bias only. We adopted the SDT method to compare the viability of the traditional and the response bias accounts. In Chapter 1 the relevant literature is reviewed. In Chapter 2 four experiments which employed a novel SDT-based forced choice reasoning method are presented, showing evidence compatible with motivated reasoning. In Chapter 3 four experiments which used the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) method are presented. Crucially, cognitive ability turned out to be linked to motivated reasoning. In Chapter 4 three experiments are presented in which we investigated the impact of cognitive ability and analytic cognitive style on belief bias, concluding that cognitive style mediated the effects of cognitive ability on motivated reasoning. In Chapter 5 we discuss our findings in light of a novel individual differences account of belief bias. We conclude that using the appropriate measurement method and taking individual differences into account are two key elements to furthering our understanding of belief bias, human reasoning, and cognitive psychology in general.

en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipSchool of Psychologyen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherUniversity of Plymouthen_US
dc.subjectDeductive Reasoningen_US
dc.subjectBelief Biasen_US
dc.subjectMotivated Reasoningen_US
dc.subjectResponse Biasen_US
dc.subjectSignal Detection Theoryen_US
dc.subjectSDTen_US
dc.subjectIndividual Differencesen_US
dc.subjectForced Choiceen_US
dc.subjectCognitive Abilityen_US
dc.subjectAnalytic Cognitive Styleen_US
dc.titleMotivated Reasoning and Response Bias: A Signal Detection Approachen_US
dc.typeThesis
plymouth.versionFull versionen_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.24382/4784


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


All items in PEARL are protected by copyright law.
Author manuscripts deposited to comply with open access mandates are made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the details provided on the item record or document. In the absence of an open licence (e.g. Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher or author.
Theme by 
Atmire NV