Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorFONTANI, SONIA
dc.contributor.otherFaculty of Science and Engineeringen_US
dc.date.accessioned2013-11-18T13:09:42Z
dc.date.available2013-11-18T13:09:42Z
dc.date.issued2009
dc.identifierNOT AVAILABLEen_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10026.1/2733
dc.description.abstract

Biodiversity ultimately is genetic diversity. Genetic diversity within species is eroded before negative trends in biodiversity become evident as loss of species or habitats. Hence, monitoring biodiversity at the genetic level may indicate what will happen at higher levels of organisation if the trend is allowed to continue. There is a pervasive belief that marine ecosystems are less vulnerable to biodiversity loss than terrestrial ones, due to marine species' high dispersal ability and connectivity, large geographic ranges, low genetic differentiation among populations and high genetic variation within populations. Many studies offer compelling evidence that it is not so: loss of genetic variation due to natural and anthropogenic factors has been detected even in marine species with potentially high dispersal. In this context the genetic pattern of the European barnacle Chthamalus montagui, a species with high dispersal capability, was investigated from three different perspectives using polymorphic microsatellite loci as molecular markers. The effect of structures created to protect coastal areas in the Adriatic Sea, was investigated to test the hypothesis that artificial substrates can act as "corridors" facilitating gene flow among previously isolated populations. The genetic pattern of central populations was compared to that of peripheral/marginal populations over the range of C. montagui in the UK, to test the hypothesis that marginal and peripheral populations tend to be less genetically variable than central ones. For both studies results were consistent with the formulated hypotheses at the 3 analysed loci. Finally, a broader survey of the NE Atlantic and Mediterranean range of this barnacle was carried out to assess spatial scales of genetic variation. A clear differentiation between Atlantic and Mediterranean samples was detected; however, the major source of genetic variation was within sites at a very small spatial scale. The information gained generates insights for marine genetic management and conservation planning.

en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipMarine Biological Association of the UK, Plymouth and ENEA - Marine Environment Research Centre S. Teresa, Italyen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherUniversity of Plymouthen_US
dc.titleGENETIC BIODIVERSITY OF THE EUROPEAN BARNACLE CHTHAMALUS MONTAGUIen_US
dc.typeThesis
plymouth.versionFull versionen_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.24382/4545


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


All items in PEARL are protected by copyright law.
Author manuscripts deposited to comply with open access mandates are made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the details provided on the item record or document. In the absence of an open licence (e.g. Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher or author.
Theme by 
Atmire NV