Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorTromans, S
dc.contributor.authorRobinson, G
dc.contributor.authorGabrielsson, A
dc.contributor.authorBassett, P
dc.contributor.authorSawhney, I
dc.contributor.authorTriantafyllopoulou, P
dc.contributor.authorHassiotis, A
dc.contributor.authorShankar, R
dc.date.accessioned2024-03-31T10:19:32Z
dc.date.available2024-03-31T10:19:32Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier.issn0020-7640
dc.identifier.issn1741-2854
dc.identifier.urihttps://pearl.plymouth.ac.uk/handle/10026.1/22230
dc.description.abstract

<jats:sec><jats:title>Background:</jats:title><jats:p> The Draft Mental Health Bill proposes removal of both intellectual disability and autism from Section 3 of the Mental Health Act for England and Wales (MHA). This would lead to people with intellectual disability (PwID) and/or autism could not be detained beyond 28 days, in the absence of diagnosed co-occurring mental illness. </jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Aim:</jats:title><jats:p> To obtain views of psychiatrists working with PwID in England and Wales regarding the proposed MHA changes. This study focusses specifically on the impact on PwID. </jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Methods:</jats:title><jats:p> A cross-sectional online mixed methodology survey of Likert and free-text response questions was developed, to ascertain perceptions of proposed legislative changes to the MHA. A non-discriminatory exponential snowballing technique leading to non-probability sampling was used to disseminate the survey. Quantitative data was analysed using descriptive statistics, Mann-Whitney and Fisher’s exact tests. Thematic analysis was conducted on free text responses. </jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results:</jats:title><jats:p> A total of 82 psychiatrists (33%) from approximately 250 eligible completed the survey. Nearly two-thirds (64%) reported good awareness of the proposed changes, with over half (55%) reporting disagreement with the changes. Psychiatrists working in inpatient settings for PwID reported increased awareness of the changes, less agreement with the reforms, and increased expectations of the reforms having negative unintended consequences, compared to their peers working exclusively in the community. Consultants reported greater disagreement with the changes compared to their non-consultant peers. Qualitative analysis identified five main themes: impact on diagnosis and treatment, seeking alternative options, introducing inequities, resources, and meeting holistic care goals through the Care, Education and Treatment Reviews (CETR) process. </jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusion:</jats:title><jats:p> Psychiatrists working with PwID report widespread disagreement with the proposed changes to the MHA for PwID, with greater levels of disagreement among those working in inpatient services. Caution with respect to the proposed changes, and monitoring of the impact of the changes if implemented, is advised. </jats:p></jats:sec>

dc.format.extent388-401
dc.format.mediumPrint-Electronic
dc.languageen
dc.publisherSAGE Publications
dc.subjectMental Health Act
dc.subjectdevelopmental disability
dc.subjectbehaviours that challenge
dc.subjectmental disorders
dc.subjectdetention
dc.subjectsectioning
dc.titleThe views of psychiatrists on proposed changes to the England and Wales Mental Health Act 1983 legislation for people with intellectual disability: A national study
dc.typeJournal Article
plymouth.author-urlhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38001564
plymouth.issue2
plymouth.volume70
plymouth.publication-statusPublished online
plymouth.journalInternational Journal of Social Psychiatry
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/00207640231212112
plymouth.organisational-group|Plymouth
plymouth.organisational-group|Plymouth|Faculty of Health
plymouth.organisational-group|Plymouth|Users by role
dc.publisher.placeEngland
dc.date.updated2024-03-31T10:19:31Z
dc.identifier.eissn1741-2854
dc.rights.embargoperiodforever
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1177/00207640231212112


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


All items in PEARL are protected by copyright law.
Author manuscripts deposited to comply with open access mandates are made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the details provided on the item record or document. In the absence of an open licence (e.g. Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher or author.
Theme by 
Atmire NV