Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBRAND, STEVEN JAMES
dc.contributor.otherPlymouth Business Schoolen_US
dc.date.accessioned2013-10-10T12:19:21Z
dc.date.available2013-10-10T12:19:21Z
dc.date.issued1998
dc.identifierNOT AVAILABLEen_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10026.1/2155
dc.description.abstract

This thesis lays the foundation for the creation of an economic database for the counties of Devon and Cornwall in the form of a regional input-output table. The thesis reconsiders the popular hybrid approach to the construction of such tables. In particular, the nonsurvey-to-survey ordering of procedure is questioned. The thesis attempts to restore a more logical preference-order which begins with first-best (survey) estimation methods and extends to second-best (survey-based-nonsurvey) methods. The third-best methods of estimation (pure nonsurvey i.e. location quotient) are excluded from the process altogether. The thesis is largely concerned with the development of the second-best method. The second-best method is derived from an empirical analysis of the nature of nonsurvey estimation error. The analysis is able to reject the Stevens et al. (1983) hypothesis that differences in regional and national production functions are insignificant. Nevertheless, the strategy of developing 'trade-only' nonsurvey estimation methods is found to be valid since, whilst the error associated with regional trade misspecification can be reduced within a broad method of estimation, the error attributable to the misspecification of regional production functions remains largely intractable to such an approach. Survey resources must therefore be devoted to the specification of these functions. The second-best methodology extends the Stevens et al. (1983) by deriving equations that specify the RAS algorithm and local expenditure propensities for households from empirical data for Scotland. These equations have general application within the new hybrid methodology. By restoring a more logical preference-order of approach to estimating hybrid regional input-output tables, emphasis is placed on the analytical strength afforded by a good data set, and not on the analytical 'strength' of magic-box mathematics. This should encourage the regional input-output table to be implemented as an evolving local economic database, which will improve the general quality of regional analysis and, in the long-run, offer cost-savings in data collection and collation.

en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherUniversity of Plymouthen_US
dc.titleA REASSESSMENT OF THE HYBRID APPROACH TO THE CONSTRUCTION OF REGIONAL INPUT-OUTPUT TABLESen_US
dc.typeThesis
plymouth.versionFull versionen_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.24382/3380
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.24382/3380


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


All items in PEARL are protected by copyright law.
Author manuscripts deposited to comply with open access mandates are made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the details provided on the item record or document. In the absence of an open licence (e.g. Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher or author.
Theme by 
Atmire NV