Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHobart, J
dc.contributor.authorBowen, A
dc.contributor.authorEberhard, L
dc.contributor.authorPepper, G
dc.contributor.authorGiovannoni, G
dc.date.accessioned2023-05-24T09:54:55Z
dc.date.available2023-05-24T09:54:55Z
dc.date.issued2018-06
dc.identifier.urihttps://pearl.plymouth.ac.uk/handle/10026.1/20920
dc.description.abstract

Background and aims: The importance of prompt intervention in multiple sclerosis (MS) was described in the widely endorsed report, Brain health: time matters in multiple sclerosis.1 The present study aimed to define standards for the timing of key steps in the care pathway. Methods: An international group of 29 MS neurologists was recruited to participate in a Delphi process. Across five rounds, they defined ‘core’, ‘achievable’ and ‘aspirational’ standards (to reflect a minimum, good and high standard of MS care, respectively). A Reviewing Group of 31 MS nurses, experts with MS and allied healthcare professionals reviewed the results and provided feedback. Results: Consensus was reached (≥75% agreement; n=21) on core, achievable and aspirational standards for 21 steps in the MS care pathway, covering symptom onset, referral, diagnosis, treatment decisions, lifestyle, monitoring, and managing new symptoms. For example, the panel agreed that MS teams should complete a diagnostic workup for MS within 2 months of referral to a neurologist as a core standard, and that completion within 4 weeks of referral should be achievable for most MS teams, with completion within 7 days as an aspirational standard. Here, we will present core, achievable and aspirational standards for key steps in the MS care pathway. Conclusion: These standards will inform tools for clinics and people with MS and act as a future benchmark for established and developing MS clinics across the globe aiming to deliver the highest quality care. Reference 1. Giovannoni G et al. Mult Scler Relat Disord 2016;9 Suppl 1:S5–S48.

dc.subject32 Biomedical and Clinical Sciences
dc.subject3209 Neurosciences
dc.subject3202 Clinical Sciences
dc.titleInternational consensus on quality standards for multiple sclerosis care: results from a modified Delphi process
dc.typepresentation
plymouth.author-urlhttps://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000435272002257&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=11bb513d99f797142bcfeffcc58ea008
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/ene.13700
plymouth.organisational-group|Plymouth
plymouth.organisational-group|Plymouth|Research Groups
plymouth.organisational-group|Plymouth|Faculty of Health
plymouth.organisational-group|Plymouth|Research Groups|Institute of Translational and Stratified Medicine (ITSMED)
plymouth.organisational-group|Plymouth|Research Groups|Institute of Translational and Stratified Medicine (ITSMED)|CCT&PS
plymouth.organisational-group|Plymouth|REF 2021 Researchers by UoA
plymouth.organisational-group|Plymouth|Users by role
plymouth.organisational-group|Plymouth|Users by role|Academics
plymouth.organisational-group|Plymouth|REF 2021 Researchers by UoA|UoA03 Allied Health Professions, Dentistry, Nursing and Pharmacy
plymouth.organisational-group|Plymouth|Faculty of Health|Peninsula Medical School
dc.publisher.place4th Congress of the European Academy of Neurology, Lisbon, Portugal, June 2018
dc.date.updated2023-05-24T09:54:54Z
dc.rights.embargodate2023-5-25
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1111/ene.13700


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


All items in PEARL are protected by copyright law.
Author manuscripts deposited to comply with open access mandates are made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the details provided on the item record or document. In the absence of an open licence (e.g. Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher or author.
Theme by 
Atmire NV