Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorZavattini, A
dc.contributor.authorKnight, A
dc.contributor.authorFoschi, Federico
dc.contributor.authorMannocci, F
dc.date.accessioned2023-05-05T12:12:15Z
dc.date.available2023-05-05T12:12:15Z
dc.date.issued2020-03
dc.identifier.issn2077-0383
dc.identifier.issn2077-0383
dc.identifier.other782
dc.identifier.urihttps://pearl.plymouth.ac.uk/handle/10026.1/20836
dc.description.abstract

Background: The aim of this study was to compare the success rate of root canal treatments undertaken using a calcium silicate root canal sealer in combination with a single cone with non-calcium silicate cement and warm vertical condensation. Methods: 150 necrotic or pulpitic teeth were treated. (REC: 08/H0804/79). Following standardized root canal chemo-debridement. The canals were obturated using warm vertical condensation of gutta-percha and epoxy-based sealer (AH plus) or a calcium silicate sealer (BioRootTM RCS) with a single cone technique. Follow-up assessment was conducted at 12 months using Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT). Results: At 1-year recall, 104 teeth were assessed (51 AH plus, 53 BioRootTM RCS). The success rate using loose criteria for the CBCT images and PA radiographs was respectively 80% and 89% in the AH plus/warm vertical condensation group, 84% and 90% in the BioRootTM RCS/single cone group. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups (Fisher exact test p value 0.6099 for the CBCT images). Conclusion: Within the limitations of this non-randomized trial, a calcium silicate cement in combination with single cone resulted in a similar proportion of successful cases compared to warm vertical condensation and epoxy-based sealer.

dc.format.extent782-782
dc.format.mediumElectronic
dc.languageen
dc.publisherMDPI AG
dc.subjectroot canal
dc.subjectbiosilicate cement
dc.subjectbioroot
dc.subjectsingle cone
dc.subjectCBCT
dc.subjectwarm vertical condensation
dc.subjecthydraulic cements
dc.titleOutcome of Root Canal Treatments Using a New Calcium Silicate Root Canal Sealer: A Non-Randomized Clinical Trial
dc.typejournal-article
dc.typeJournal Article
plymouth.author-urlhttps://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000527278800171&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=11bb513d99f797142bcfeffcc58ea008
plymouth.issue3
plymouth.volume9
plymouth.publication-statusPublished online
plymouth.journalJournal of Clinical Medicine
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/jcm9030782
plymouth.organisational-group|Plymouth
plymouth.organisational-group|Plymouth|Faculty of Health
plymouth.organisational-group|Plymouth|Users by role
plymouth.organisational-group|Plymouth|Users by role|Academics
plymouth.organisational-group|Plymouth|Faculty of Health|Peninsula Dental School
dc.publisher.placeSwitzerland
dcterms.dateAccepted2020-03-11
dc.date.updated2023-05-05T12:12:09Z
dc.rights.embargodate2023-8-16
dc.identifier.eissn2077-0383
dc.rights.embargoperiodforever
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.3390/jcm9030782


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


All items in PEARL are protected by copyright law.
Author manuscripts deposited to comply with open access mandates are made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the details provided on the item record or document. In the absence of an open licence (e.g. Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher or author.
Theme by 
Atmire NV