Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorRoche, D
dc.contributor.authorJones, Aled
dc.date.accessioned2023-04-24T09:32:11Z
dc.date.available2023-04-24T09:32:11Z
dc.date.issued2023-04-13
dc.identifier.issn1440-1800
dc.identifier.issn1440-1800
dc.identifier.urihttps://pearl.plymouth.ac.uk/handle/10026.1/20749
dc.description.abstract

<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>The main aim of this paper is to explore and discuss the interesting juxtaposition of patient involvement within a standardised Enhanced Recovery After Surgery care programme (ERAS). We address our aim by examining the work and strategies of nursing staff caring for patients during postoperative recovery from surgery, exploring how these two potentially competing priorities might effectively co‐exist within a hospital ward. This was a qualitative exploratory study, with data generated through 42 semi‐structured interviews with patients and nurses who had taken part in an ERAS programme in one of three hospital wards in the United Kingdom, adopting a reflexive thematic approach to data analysis. We shine a light on the work undertaken by patients and nurses during the navigation of postoperative recovery, identifying strategies of collaboration and negotiation during this journey. Furthermore, we also identify and consider patients engaged in peer‐peer support during postoperative recovery. This paper adds to the existing literature and current ways of thinking in relation to the quest for standardised, clinically effective care balanced with the aspirations for individualised, patient‐centred care. This paper also helps inform thinking about the use of care pathways in relation to service delivery, considering how best to initiate and deploy best practice aimed at safe and effective postoperative recovery.</jats:p>

dc.format.extente12553-
dc.format.mediumPrint-Electronic
dc.languageen
dc.publisherWiley
dc.subjectengagement
dc.subjectERAS
dc.subjectnursing
dc.subjectpatient involvement
dc.subjectpeer support
dc.subjectsurgical care
dc.titleA qualitative exploration of the strategies used by patients and nurses when navigating a standardised care programme
dc.typejournal-article
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.typeResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
plymouth.author-urlhttps://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000970925000001&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=11bb513d99f797142bcfeffcc58ea008
plymouth.issue3
plymouth.volume30
plymouth.publication-statusPublished
plymouth.journalNursing Inquiry
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/nin.12553
plymouth.organisational-group|Plymouth
plymouth.organisational-group|Plymouth|Faculty of Health
plymouth.organisational-group|Plymouth|Faculty of Health|School of Nursing and Midwifery
plymouth.organisational-group|Plymouth|Users by role
plymouth.organisational-group|Plymouth|Users by role|Academics
dc.publisher.placeAustralia
dcterms.dateAccepted2023-03-24
dc.date.updated2023-04-24T09:32:05Z
dc.rights.embargodate2023-4-25
dc.identifier.eissn1440-1800
dc.rights.embargoperiodforever
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1111/nin.12553


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


All items in PEARL are protected by copyright law.
Author manuscripts deposited to comply with open access mandates are made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the details provided on the item record or document. In the absence of an open licence (e.g. Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher or author.
Theme by 
Atmire NV