Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorPAYTON, PHILIP JOHN
dc.contributor.otherFaculty of Arts, Humanities and Businessen_US
dc.date.accessioned2013-10-08T08:42:54Z
dc.date.available2013-10-08T08:42:54Z
dc.date.issued1989
dc.identifierNOT AVAILABLEen_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10026.1/2071
dc.descriptionMerged with duplicate record 10026.1/778 on 08.03.2017 by CS (TIS)
dc.description.abstract

The political events of the 1960s and 1970s in "Celtic Britain" led to the demise of the Anglocentric conventional wisdom which had asserted the fundamental homogeneity of the United Kingdom, and ushered in a new orthodoxy which stressed diversity and the territorial dimension of the state. Ihese events were mirrored to an extent in Cornwall, with competing explanations seeking to interpret "peripheral protest", but with a more comprehensive model emerging to emphasise the complexity of the relationship between "centre" and "periphery" in modern western European states, pointing in particular to the existence of historical phases of peripherality. In an initial phase of "Older Peripheralism", Cornwall was isolated territorially and culturally from the core of the expanding English state, conquered and annexed but with an array of constitutionally "accommodating" devices and a multi-faceted Celtic identity. However, political and economic change eroded this isolation, creating a new era of "second Peripheralism". This phase was marked by a rapid industrialisation which brought Cornwall into the forefront of technological innovation but which was over-specialised and incomplete, leading initially to a new, assertive sense of identity based upon technological prowess but precipitating in the longer term industrial collapse and a consequent Cornish social, economic and political paralysis. This paralysis endured from the end of the nineteenth century until after the Second World War, an experience which was highly distinctive when compared to that of England. However, this paralysis was at length disturbed, with post-war Regional Development policies facilitating the construction of a "branch factory" economy in Cornwall and encouraging a process of "counterurbanisation”. Paradoxically, this socio-economic movement led not to the erosion of Cornwall's peripheral status but was in fact evidence of a "Third Peripheralism", with the Cornish economy acquiring features which continued to contrast with those of England's core, and with an increasingly politicised "Cornish Revival" injecting an important strand of anti-metropolitanism into Cornish political behaviour, with its critiques of regional policy and demands for renewed constitutional "accommodation".

en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherUniversity of Plymouthen_US
dc.titleMODERN CORNWALL: THE CHANGING NATURE OF PERIPHERALITYen_US
dc.typeThesis
plymouth.versionFull versionen_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.24382/4644
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.24382/4644


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


All items in PEARL are protected by copyright law.
Author manuscripts deposited to comply with open access mandates are made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the details provided on the item record or document. In the absence of an open licence (e.g. Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher or author.
Theme by 
Atmire NV