Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorJacob, C
dc.contributor.authorDuPrey Diederichsen, S
dc.contributor.authorFullbrook, L
dc.contributor.authorLombard, AT
dc.contributor.authorRees, Sian
dc.contributor.authorRivers, N
dc.contributor.authorSnow, B
dc.contributor.authorStrand, M
dc.contributor.authorZuercher, R
dc.contributor.authorNiner, Holly
dc.date.accessioned2023-02-08T13:30:56Z
dc.date.available2023-02-08T13:30:56Z
dc.date.issued2023-03
dc.identifier.issn0308-597X
dc.identifier.issn1872-9460
dc.identifier.other105507
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10026.1/20255
dc.description.abstract

Although stakeholder engagement is one of the founding principles of marine spatial planning (MSP), meaningful representation of people and their connections to marine resources within marine governance is still lacking. A broad understanding of how concepts surrounding social capital and capacity is translated into MSP practice is missing. With this article, we describe detailed case studies in the United Kingdom, Brazil and South Africa to build a better understanding of the ways in which MSP and other ocean governance initiatives operationalise the concepts of social capital and capacity. Drawing on insights from the cases, we call for a rethinking of capacitation as a two-way process. In particular, trust-building, social learning and efforts to build social capacity should be elaborated without imposing a hierarchy between people ‘who know’ and people ‘who don’t’. Innovative approaches to relationship building, knowledge development, and collaboration highlighted in the case studies highlight ways to build social capacity both among stakeholders and planners, as is necessary for more equitable and sustainable MSP development and implementation.

dc.format.extent105507-105507
dc.languageen
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherElsevier BV
dc.subjectMarine spatial planning
dc.subjectSocial capacity
dc.subjectSocial capital
dc.subjectOcean governance
dc.subjectCoastal communities
dc.subjectSocial sustainability
dc.titleA two way process – Social capacity as a driver and outcome of equitable marine spatial planning
dc.typejournal-article
dc.typeJournal Article
plymouth.author-urlhttps://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000967468200001&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=11bb513d99f797142bcfeffcc58ea008
plymouth.volume149
plymouth.publication-statusPublished
plymouth.journalMarine Policy
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.marpol.2023.105507
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Science and Engineering
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Science and Engineering/School of Biological and Marine Sciences
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Users by role
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Users by role/Academics
dcterms.dateAccepted2023-01-22
dc.rights.embargodate2023-2-9
dc.identifier.eissn1872-9460
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1016/j.marpol.2023.105507
rioxxterms.licenseref.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


All items in PEARL are protected by copyright law.
Author manuscripts deposited to comply with open access mandates are made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the details provided on the item record or document. In the absence of an open licence (e.g. Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher or author.
Theme by 
Atmire NV