Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKing, Ien
dc.contributor.authorMartin, Jen
dc.date.accessioned2022-11-24T13:41:05Z
dc.date.available2022-11-24T13:41:05Z
dc.date.issued2021-11-01en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10026.1/20001
dc.description.abstract

As both the concept of ‘landscape’ and ‘beauty’ have very perceptual definitions, they must be assessed by large groups to be appropriately addressed. Therefore, amid a review of AONB designation, cultural perceptions of what is valuable within these designated areas is of paramount importance. Ecosystem services have gained traction as a way to assign social value to the non-physical benefits landscape can provide. AONB landscapes have a list of ‘special qualities’ (SQs) which are the features and characteristics of this area that warrant its protection. This study looks at the extent to which SQs reflect public values. Multiple methods including photo elicitation, participatory mapping, in-person surveys and social media data analysis have been used. The study suggests that when presented with the same landscape there is huge diversity as to what should be considered ‘special’. There is a general preference of landscape heterogeneity, therefore no one SQ could be more important than any of the others if considered in isolation. SQs that have a tangible link to the cultural ecosystem services they provide, were most appreciated. All methods used had their own benefits and flaws, hence future research should use a combination of methods to address perception issues.

en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.rightsAttribution-ShareAlike 4.0 Internationalen
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/en
dc.titleExploring public recognition and perceived cultural value of the special qualities within english areas of outstanding natural beautyen
dc.typeJournal Article
plymouth.issue21en
plymouth.volume13en
plymouth.publication-statusPublisheden
plymouth.journalSustainability (Switzerland)en
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/su132112178en
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Admin Group - R&I
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/PS - Research & Innovation
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA/UoA13 Architecture, Built Environment and Planning
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Users by role
dc.identifier.eissn2071-1050en
dc.rights.embargoperiodNot knownen
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.3390/su132112178en
rioxxterms.licenseref.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/en
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International

All items in PEARL are protected by copyright law.
Author manuscripts deposited to comply with open access mandates are made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the details provided on the item record or document. In the absence of an open licence (e.g. Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher or author.
Theme by 
Atmire NV