Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorAli, Kamran
dc.contributor.authorWinter, J
dc.contributor.authorWebb, OJ
dc.contributor.authorZahra, D
dc.date.accessioned2022-11-02T11:19:20Z
dc.date.issued2022-09-09
dc.identifier.issn1476-5373
dc.identifier.issn1476-5373
dc.identifier.other233
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10026.1/19823
dc.description.abstract

<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p><jats:bold>Aims</jats:bold> To explore experiences and perceptions of students and staff regarding decolonisation of the curriculum in a dental undergraduate programme.</jats:p><jats:p><jats:bold>Methods </jats:bold> Participants were invited to respond to an online survey on decolonisation of the dental curriculum. The target population included current students on the Bachelor of Dental Surgery and Bachelor of Dental Therapy and Hygiene programmes, as well as dental staff at a university in the South West region of England. The common items for student and staff versions of the survey were focused on six themes: representation; content; peer engagement; assessment; language and communication; and culture. All responses were anonymous. Data on programme, year of study, age, sex and ethnicity were captured on a voluntary basis.</jats:p><jats:p><jats:bold>Results</jats:bold> In total, 34 staff members and 120 students from two different programmes participated in the survey, yielding a response rate of 87.17% for staff and 45.28% for students. A comparison showed that average student responses were lower compared with average staff responses. Of the 24 survey items, 17 showed significantly lower scores reported by minority ethnic (ME) students. ME students were, when compared with white counterparts, less likely to report that their programme included opportunities for group discussions about ethnicity and privilege. Similar comparisons of staff responses did not show significant differences between white and ME staff. Nevertheless, responses by staff and students across the board highlighted the need for further steps to improve the representation of ME groups in the curriculum.</jats:p><jats:p><jats:bold>Conclusions</jats:bold> This study provides useful insights into the perceptions and experiences of students and staff regarding the decolonisation of the dental curriculum in an undergraduate dental programme. Responses by the participants across the board identified several areas which could benefit from better representation of ME groups. Significant differences were noted between staff and student scores and also between white and ME students, indicating the latter group demonstrated more awareness regarding issues of representation. The findings underscore the need to take further steps to decolonise dental curricula.</jats:p>

dc.format.extent415-422
dc.format.mediumPrint-Electronic
dc.languageen
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherSpringer Nature [academic journals on nature.com]
dc.subjectCurriculum
dc.subjectEducation, Dental
dc.subjectEthnicity
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectStudents, Dental
dc.subjectSurveys and Questionnaires
dc.titleDecolonisation of curricula in undergraduate dental education: an exploratory study
dc.typejournal-article
dc.typeJournal Article
plymouth.author-urlhttps://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000852424900036&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=11bb513d99f797142bcfeffcc58ea008
plymouth.issue5
plymouth.volume233
plymouth.publication-statusPublished
plymouth.journalBritish Dental Journal
dc.identifier.doi10.1038/s41415-022-4923-1
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Health
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/PS - Library and Academic Development
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA/UoA23 Education
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Users by role
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Users by role/Academics
dc.publisher.placeEngland
dcterms.dateAccepted2022-05-23
dc.rights.embargodate2022-11-3
dc.identifier.eissn1476-5373
dc.rights.embargoperiodNot known
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1038/s41415-022-4923-1
rioxxterms.licenseref.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2022-09
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


All items in PEARL are protected by copyright law.
Author manuscripts deposited to comply with open access mandates are made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the details provided on the item record or document. In the absence of an open licence (e.g. Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher or author.
Theme by 
Atmire NV