Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorAkintomide, H
dc.contributor.authorJames, Alison
dc.contributor.authorMoffat, M
dc.contributor.authorBarnes, P
dc.contributor.authorRankin, J
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-24T14:21:45Z
dc.date.available2022-10-24T14:21:45Z
dc.date.issued2022-10
dc.identifier.issn2044-6055
dc.identifier.issn2044-6055
dc.identifier.othere060606
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10026.1/19746
dc.description.abstract

<jats:sec><jats:title>Objectives</jats:title><jats:p>No copper intrauterine device (IUD) type is known to better suit young nulliparous women who tend to experience higher rates of IUD discontinuation compared with their older parous counterparts. A systematic review to determine which IUDs have higher continuation rates in young nulliparous women was undertaken.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Design</jats:title><jats:p>Systematic review and meta-analyses of available evidence based on IUD type.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Data sources</jats:title><jats:p>AMED, BNI, CINAHL, DARE, EMBASE, EMCARE, HMIC, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, PubMed, TRIP, and the Cochrane Library electronic databases were searched from inception to 11 May 2022; as well as the Bandolier, Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency, Faculty of Sexual and Reproductive Healthcare, Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, Department of Health, National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines, WHO and Google Scholar websites.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Eligibility criteria</jats:title><jats:p>All studies on IUDs currently available in the UK or comparable (same design and size) to those available in the UK, involving nulliparous women of any age including those aged under 30.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Data extraction and synthesis</jats:title><jats:p>Independently extracted data were assessed as low risk of bias using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. Random effects meta-analyses of proportions were performed where data, including subgroups, were amenable to quantitative synthesis. Heterogeneity was reported using tau<jats:sup>2</jats:sup> and I<jats:sup>2</jats:sup> statistics, and sensitivity analyses were also performed.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results</jats:title><jats:p>Nineteen studies involving 13 045 nulliparous women were included but the heterogeneity of participant ages, parity and IUD types made quantitative synthesis of outcome data in totality inappropriate. The highest continuation rate obtained was 91.02% (95% CI 88.01% to 93.64%) for the smaller TCu 380A at 12 months post insertion.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusions</jats:title><jats:p>Evidence for IUD use in young nulliparous women based on IUD type remains limited. Smaller sized IUD types appear better suited to this group of IUD users, however, more research is needed.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>PROSPERO registration number</jats:title><jats:p>CRD42019120969.</jats:p></jats:sec>

dc.format.extente060606-e060606
dc.format.mediumElectronic
dc.languageen
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherBMJ Publishing Group
dc.subjectreproductive medicine
dc.subjectcommunity gynaecology
dc.subjectpublic health
dc.titleSystematic review of copper intrauterine contraception continuation in young nulliparous women based on intrauterine device type
dc.typejournal-article
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.typeSystematic Review
dc.typeResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
plymouth.author-urlhttps://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000866249200001&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=11bb513d99f797142bcfeffcc58ea008
plymouth.issue10
plymouth.volume12
plymouth.publication-statusPublished
plymouth.journalBMJ Open
dc.identifier.doi10.1136/bmjopen-2021-060606
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Health
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Health/School of Nursing and Midwifery
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Users by role
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Users by role/Academics
dc.publisher.placeEngland
dcterms.dateAccepted2022-08-09
dc.rights.embargodate2022-10-25
dc.identifier.eissn2044-6055
dc.rights.embargoperiodNot known
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1136/bmjopen-2021-060606
rioxxterms.licenseref.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


All items in PEARL are protected by copyright law.
Author manuscripts deposited to comply with open access mandates are made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the details provided on the item record or document. In the absence of an open licence (e.g. Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher or author.
Theme by 
Atmire NV