Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHowell, CA
dc.contributor.authorKemppinen, A
dc.contributor.authorAllgar, Victoria
dc.contributor.authorDodd, M
dc.contributor.authorKnowles, CH
dc.contributor.authorMcLaughlin, J
dc.contributor.authorPandya, P
dc.contributor.authorWhorwell, P
dc.contributor.authorMarkaryan, E
dc.contributor.authorYiannakou, Y
dc.date.accessioned2022-07-21T14:44:29Z
dc.date.issued2022-06-27
dc.identifier.issn0017-5749
dc.identifier.issn1468-3288
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10026.1/19424
dc.description.abstract

<jats:sec><jats:title>Objective</jats:title><jats:p>Irritable bowel syndrome with diarrhoea (IBS-D) is a common and challenging condition that significantly reduces quality of life. Enterosgel (polymethylsiloxane polyhydrate) is an intestinal adsorbent which sequesters harmful molecules and is safe and effective in acute infective diarrhoea. This randomised controlled multicentre trial aimed to investigate its safety and efficacy in patients with IBS-D.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Design</jats:title><jats:p>After a 2-week screening phase, participants were randomised into an 8-week double-blind phase, followed by an 8-week open-label and follow-up phase. Participants recorded stool consistency, pain and global symptoms in e-diaries and questionnaires. The primary outcome was the percentage of responders on a composite abdominal pain (≥30% decrease in the weekly score) and stool consistency (50% reduction in days per week with at least one stool of BSFS type 6 or 7) score during at least 4 weeks of the treatment period.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results</jats:title><jats:p>440 patients with IBS-D were randomised to the double-blind phase with 393 continuing to the open-label phase. The Primary outcome responder rate by intention-to-treat for enterosgel versus placebo was 37.4% vs 24.3% (OR 1.95, NNT 8, p=0.002). Enterosgel also improved stool consistency (48.5% vs 32.5%, p&lt;0.0001) abdominal pain (53.3% vs 40.2%, p=0.003), stool frequency (treatment effect −0.32 (−0.62 to −0.02)) and urgency (treatment effect −0.59 (−0.85 to −0.33)). 60% of patients reported adequate relief of symptoms after open-label treatment. Adverse event frequency was similar in both groups, with no serious events attributable to enterosgel.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusion</jats:title><jats:p>Enterosgel is safe and effective in IBS-D, providing an alternative to the limited current treatment options.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Trial registration number</jats:title><jats:p><jats:ext-link xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" ext-link-type="isrctn" xlink:href="ISRCTN17149988">ISRCTN17149988</jats:ext-link>.</jats:p></jats:sec>

dc.format.extent2430-2438
dc.format.mediumPrint-Electronic
dc.languageen
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherBMJ Publishing Group
dc.subjectirritable bowel syndrome
dc.subjectdiarrhoea
dc.subjectabdominal pain
dc.titleDouble-blinded randomised placebo controlled trial of enterosgel (polymethylsiloxane polyhydrate) for the treatment of IBS with diarrhoea (IBS-D)
dc.typejournal-article
dc.typeRandomized Controlled Trial
dc.typeMulticenter Study
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.typeResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
plymouth.author-urlhttps://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000818049500001&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=11bb513d99f797142bcfeffcc58ea008
plymouth.issue12
plymouth.volume71
plymouth.publication-statusPublished
plymouth.journalGut
dc.identifier.doi10.1136/gutjnl-2022-327293
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Health
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Health/Peninsula Medical School
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA/UoA01 Clinical Medicine
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Research Groups
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Research Groups/Plymouth Institute of Health and Care Research (PIHR)
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Users by role
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Users by role/Academics
dc.publisher.placeEngland
dcterms.dateAccepted2022-06-12
dc.rights.embargodate2022-7-22
dc.identifier.eissn1468-3288
dc.rights.embargoperiodNot known
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1136/gutjnl-2022-327293
rioxxterms.licenseref.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2022-06-27
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


All items in PEARL are protected by copyright law.
Author manuscripts deposited to comply with open access mandates are made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the details provided on the item record or document. In the absence of an open licence (e.g. Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher or author.
Theme by 
Atmire NV