Clinical risk in remote consultations in general practice: findings from in-Covid-19 pandemic qualitative research
dc.contributor.author | Rosen, R | |
dc.contributor.author | Wieringa, S | |
dc.contributor.author | Greenhalgh, T | |
dc.contributor.author | Leone, C | |
dc.contributor.author | Rybczynska-Bunt, Sarah | |
dc.contributor.author | Hughes, G | |
dc.contributor.author | Moore, L | |
dc.contributor.author | Shaw, S | |
dc.contributor.author | Wherton, J | |
dc.contributor.author | Byng, Richard | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-06-28T08:57:58Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2022-04-29 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 2398-3795 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 2398-3795 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10026.1/19346 | |
dc.description.abstract |
<jats:sec><jats:title>Background</jats:title><jats:p>The Covid-19 pandemic-related rise in remote consulting raises questions about the nature and type of risks in remote general practice</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Aim</jats:title><jats:p>To develop an empirically-based and theory-informed taxonomy of risks associated with remote consultations.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Design and setting</jats:title><jats:p>Qualitative sub-study of data selected from the wider datasets of three large, multi-site, mixed-method studies of remote care in general practice prior to and during the Covid-19 pandemic in the UK</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Method</jats:title><jats:p>Semi-structured interviews and focus groups with a total of 176 clinicians, and 45 patients. We analysed data thematically, taking account of an existing framework of domains of clinical risk.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results</jats:title><jats:p>The Covid-19 pandemic brought changes to estates (eg, how waiting rooms were used), access pathways, technologies, and interpersonal interactions. Six domains of risk were evident in relation to[1] practice organisation and set-up (including digital inequalities of access, technology failure and reduced service efficiency); [2] communication and the therapeutic relationship (including a shift to more transactional consultations); [3] quality of clinical care (including missed diagnoses, safeguarding challenges, over-investigation and over-treatment); [4] increased burden on the patient (eg, to self-examine and navigate between services); [5] reduced opportunities for screening and managing the social determinants of health; and [6] workforce (including increased clinician stress and fewer opportunities for learning).</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusion</jats:title><jats:p>Notwithstanding potential benefits, if remote consultations are to work safely, risks must be actively mitigated by measures that include digital inclusion strategies, enhanced safety-netting and training and support for staff.</jats:p></jats:sec> | |
dc.format.extent | BJGPO.2021.0204-BJGPO.2021.0204 | |
dc.format.medium | Electronic-Print | |
dc.language | en | |
dc.language.iso | eng | |
dc.publisher | Royal College of General Practitioners | |
dc.subject | clinical risk | |
dc.subject | family practice | |
dc.subject | general practice | |
dc.subject | remote consultations | |
dc.subject | safeguarding | |
dc.subject | telemedicine | |
dc.title | Clinical risk in remote consultations in general practice: findings from in-Covid-19 pandemic qualitative research | |
dc.type | journal-article | |
dc.type | Journal Article | |
plymouth.author-url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35487581 | |
plymouth.issue | 3 | |
plymouth.volume | 6 | |
plymouth.publication-status | Published | |
plymouth.journal | BJGP Open | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.3399/bjgpo.2021.0204 | |
plymouth.organisational-group | /Plymouth | |
plymouth.organisational-group | /Plymouth/Faculty of Health | |
plymouth.organisational-group | /Plymouth/Faculty of Health/Peninsula Medical School | |
plymouth.organisational-group | /Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA | |
plymouth.organisational-group | /Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA/UoA03 Allied Health Professions, Dentistry, Nursing and Pharmacy | |
plymouth.organisational-group | /Plymouth/Research Groups | |
plymouth.organisational-group | /Plymouth/Research Groups/FoH - Community and Primary Care | |
plymouth.organisational-group | /Plymouth/Research Groups/Institute of Health and Community | |
plymouth.organisational-group | /Plymouth/Research Groups/Institute of Translational and Stratified Medicine (ITSMED) | |
plymouth.organisational-group | /Plymouth/Research Groups/Institute of Translational and Stratified Medicine (ITSMED)/CCT&PS | |
plymouth.organisational-group | /Plymouth/Research Groups/Plymouth Institute of Health and Care Research (PIHR) | |
plymouth.organisational-group | /Plymouth/Users by role | |
plymouth.organisational-group | /Plymouth/Users by role/Academics | |
dc.publisher.place | England | |
dcterms.dateAccepted | 2022-01-18 | |
dc.rights.embargodate | 2022-6-29 | |
dc.identifier.eissn | 2398-3795 | |
dc.rights.embargoperiod | Not known | |
rioxxterms.versionofrecord | 10.3399/bjgpo.2021.0204 | |
rioxxterms.licenseref.uri | http://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved | |
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate | 2022-04-29 | |
rioxxterms.type | Journal Article/Review |