Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorAxford, N
dc.contributor.authorMorpeth, L
dc.contributor.authorBjornstad, G
dc.contributor.authorHobbs, T
dc.contributor.authorBerry, V
dc.date.accessioned2022-06-15T19:30:39Z
dc.date.issued2022-06
dc.identifier.issn0190-7409
dc.identifier.issn1873-7765
dc.identifier.other106469
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10026.1/19310
dc.description.abstract

The last decade or more has seen a proliferation of online registries of evidence-based interventions designed to improve child and youth psychosocial outcomes. The purpose of these resources is typically to help decision-makers make sense of the evidence and thereby inform their decision-making about investment in interventions. Most registries are underpinned by standards of evidence, which are used to guide the rating of programs by a panel of experts. While supporters extol the influence of these initiatives in terms of making commissioners more discriminating about what they invest in, detractors contend that they stifle innovation and embody an unduly narrow view of evidence and intervention. Drawing on the literature, original analysis and first-hand experience of developing, applying and using standards of evidence and associated registries, this article reflects critically on their strengths and limitations, considering issues such as focus, functionality, content, consistency and impact. It also makes proposals for developing and extending the approach, focusing on its intrinsic conceptualization of intervention development, evaluation practice and pathways to impact.

dc.format.extent106469-106469
dc.languageen
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherElsevier
dc.subjectPrevention
dc.subjectEarly intervention
dc.subjectStandards of evidence
dc.subjectEvidence-based intervention
dc.subjectRegistry
dc.subjectClearinghouse
dc.subjectImplementation
dc.subjectScale
dc.title"What works" registries of interventions to improve child and youth psychosocial outcomes: a critical appraisal
dc.typejournal-article
dc.typeArticle
plymouth.volume137
plymouth.publisher-urlhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2022.106469
plymouth.publication-statusPublished
plymouth.journalChildren and Youth Services Review
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.childyouth.2022.106469
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Health
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Health/Peninsula Medical School
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA/UoA03 Allied Health Professions, Dentistry, Nursing and Pharmacy
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Research Groups
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Research Groups/FoH - Community and Primary Care
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Research Groups/Plymouth Institute of Health and Care Research (PIHR)
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Users by role
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Users by role/Academics
dcterms.dateAccepted2022-03-12
dc.rights.embargodate2022-6-17
dc.identifier.eissn1873-7765
dc.rights.embargoperiodNot known
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1016/j.childyouth.2022.106469
rioxxterms.licenseref.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


All items in PEARL are protected by copyright law.
Author manuscripts deposited to comply with open access mandates are made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the details provided on the item record or document. In the absence of an open licence (e.g. Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher or author.
Theme by 
Atmire NV