Pediatric Critical Care Nursing Research Priorities in Asia: An eDelphi Study
dc.contributor.author | Poh, P-F | |
dc.contributor.author | Sng, QW | |
dc.contributor.author | Latour, Jos M | |
dc.contributor.author | He, L | |
dc.contributor.author | Fong, MF | |
dc.contributor.author | Jayashree, M | |
dc.contributor.author | Abbas, Q | |
dc.contributor.author | Matsuishi, Y | |
dc.contributor.author | Lee, JH | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-06-08T17:15:26Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2022-07-15 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1529-7535 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1947-3893 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10026.1/19285 | |
dc.description.abstract |
<jats:sec> <jats:title>Objectives:</jats:title> <jats:p>To identify nursing research priorities in pediatric critical care in Asia.</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title>Design:</jats:title> <jats:p>We conducted a modified three-round eDelphi survey with pediatric critical care nurses in Asia. The eDelphi technique has been extensively used within health research to achieve a common viewpoint from experts using questionnaires to gather research priorities. In round 1, participants were asked to list three to five research topics that they deemed important. These topics were thematically analyzed and categorized into a questionnaire. Participants rated the research topics in round 2 on a 6-point scale (1 = not important to 6 = extremely important). In round 3, the same questionnaire was used with addition of the calculated mean scores from round 2 for each topic. Research topics ranked among the top 10 were considered extremely important.</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title>Settings:</jats:title> <jats:p>Twenty-two PICUs in eight Asian countries.</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title>SUBJECTS:</jats:title> <jats:p>Clinical nurses, managers, educators, and researchers.</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title>Interventions:</jats:title> <jats:p>None.</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title>Measurements and Main Results:</jats:title> <jats:p>In round 1, 146 PICU nurses across eight countries provided 520 research topics. Topics from round 1 were categorized into seven domains with 52 research topics. Prioritized research topics included early recognition of patient deterioration (mean 5.58 ± 0.61), prevention of healthcare-associated infections (mean 5.47 ± 0.70), and interventions to reduce compassion fatigue (mean 5.45 ± 0.80). The top three research domains were end-of-life care (mean 5.34 ± 0.68), professionalism (mean 5.34 ± 0.69), and management of pain, sedation, and delirium (5.32 ± 0.72).</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title>Conclusions:</jats:title> <jats:p>This first PICU nursing research prioritization exercise within Asia identified key nursing research themes that should be prioritized and provide a framework for future collaborative studies.</jats:p> </jats:sec> | |
dc.format.extent | e498-e506 | |
dc.format.medium | Print-Electronic | |
dc.language | en | |
dc.language.iso | en | |
dc.publisher | Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins | |
dc.subject | Asia nursing | |
dc.subject | research | |
dc.subject | children intensive care | |
dc.subject | Delphi technique | |
dc.subject | evidence-based nursing | |
dc.subject | research prioritization exercise | |
dc.title | Pediatric Critical Care Nursing Research Priorities in Asia: An eDelphi Study | |
dc.type | journal-article | |
dc.type | Journal Article | |
plymouth.author-url | https://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000935577100001&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=11bb513d99f797142bcfeffcc58ea008 | |
plymouth.issue | 11 | |
plymouth.volume | 23 | |
plymouth.publication-status | Published | |
plymouth.journal | Pediatric Critical Care Medicine | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1097/PCC.0000000000003023 | |
plymouth.organisational-group | /Plymouth | |
plymouth.organisational-group | /Plymouth/Faculty of Health | |
plymouth.organisational-group | /Plymouth/Faculty of Health/School of Nursing and Midwifery | |
plymouth.organisational-group | /Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA | |
plymouth.organisational-group | /Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA/UoA03 Allied Health Professions, Dentistry, Nursing and Pharmacy | |
plymouth.organisational-group | /Plymouth/Research Groups | |
plymouth.organisational-group | /Plymouth/Research Groups/Institute of Health and Community | |
plymouth.organisational-group | /Plymouth/Research Groups/Plymouth Institute of Health and Care Research (PIHR) | |
plymouth.organisational-group | /Plymouth/Users by role | |
plymouth.organisational-group | /Plymouth/Users by role/Academics | |
dc.publisher.place | United States | |
dcterms.dateAccepted | 2022-05-31 | |
dc.rights.embargodate | 2023-7-15 | |
dc.identifier.eissn | 1947-3893 | |
dc.rights.embargoperiod | Not known | |
rioxxterms.versionofrecord | 10.1097/PCC.0000000000003023 | |
rioxxterms.licenseref.uri | http://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved | |
rioxxterms.type | Journal Article/Review |