Using information available at the time of donor offer to predict kidney transplant survival outcomes: a systematic review of prediction models
dc.contributor.author | Riley, S | |
dc.contributor.author | Zhang, Q | |
dc.contributor.author | Tse, W-Y | |
dc.contributor.author | Connor, A | |
dc.contributor.author | Wei, Yinghui | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-05-12T16:27:59Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2022-06-23 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 0934-0874 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1432-2277 | |
dc.identifier.other | 10397 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10026.1/19220 | |
dc.description.abstract |
Statistical models that can predict graft and patient survival outcomes following kidney transplantation could be of great clinical utility. We sought to appraise existing clinical prediction models for kidney transplant survival outcomes that could guide kidney donor acceptance decision-making. We searched for clinical prediction models for survival outcomes in adult recipients with single kidney-only transplants. Models that require information anticipated to become available only after the time of transplantation were excluded as, by that time, the kidney donor acceptance decision would have already been made. The outcomes of interest were all-cause and death-censored graft failure, and death. We summarised the methodological characteristics of the prediction models, predictive performance and risk of bias. We retrieved 4,026 citations from which 23 articles describing 74 models met the inclusion criteria. Discrimination was moderate for all-cause graft failure (C-statistic: 0.570–0.652; Harrell’s C: 0.580–0.660; AUC: 0.530–0.742), death-censored graft failure (C-statistic: 0.540–0.660; Harrell’s C: 0.590–0.700; AUC: 0.450–0.810) and death (C-statistic: 0.637–0.770; Harrell’s C: 0.570–0.735). Calibration was seldom reported. Risk of bias was high in 49 of the 74 models, primarily due to methods for handling missing data. The currently available prediction models using pre-transplantation information show moderate discrimination and varied calibration. Further model development is needed to improve predictions for the purpose of clinical decision-making. | |
dc.language.iso | en | |
dc.publisher | Frontiers Media | |
dc.rights | Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International | |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ | |
dc.title | Using information available at the time of donor offer to predict kidney transplant survival outcomes: a systematic review of prediction models | |
dc.type | journal-article | |
plymouth.volume | 35 | |
plymouth.publication-status | Published online | |
plymouth.journal | Transplant International | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.3389/ti.2022.10397 | |
plymouth.organisational-group | /Plymouth | |
plymouth.organisational-group | /Plymouth/Faculty of Science and Engineering | |
plymouth.organisational-group | /Plymouth/Faculty of Science and Engineering/School of Engineering, Computing and Mathematics | |
plymouth.organisational-group | /Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA | |
plymouth.organisational-group | /Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA/EXTENDED UoA 10 - Mathematical Sciences | |
plymouth.organisational-group | /Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA/UoA10 Mathematical Sciences | |
plymouth.organisational-group | /Plymouth/Users by role | |
plymouth.organisational-group | /Plymouth/Users by role/Academics | |
plymouth.organisational-group | /Plymouth/Users by role/Researchers in ResearchFish submission | |
dcterms.dateAccepted | 2022-05-04 | |
dc.rights.embargodate | 2022-6-25 | |
dc.identifier.eissn | 1432-2277 | |
dc.rights.embargoperiod | Not known | |
rioxxterms.versionofrecord | 10.3389/ti.2022.10397 | |
rioxxterms.licenseref.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ | |
rioxxterms.type | Journal Article/Review | |
plymouth.funder | Using big data to develop and validate clinical prediction models for survival outcomes in kidney transplant::Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council and University Hospitals Plymouth NHS Trust |