Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGARIBALDI, JONATHAN MARK
dc.contributor.otherFaculty of Science and Technologyen_US
dc.date.accessioned2013-09-19T13:58:57Z
dc.date.available2013-09-19T13:58:57Z
dc.date.issued1997
dc.identifierNOT AVAILABLEen_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10026.1/1900
dc.description.abstract

Objective assessment of the neonatal outcome of labour is important, but it is a difficult and challenging problem. It is an invaluable source of information which can be used to provide feedback to clinicians, to audit a unit's overall performance, and can guide subsequent neonatal care. Current methods are inadequate as they fail to distinguish damage that occurred during labour from damage that occurred before or after labour. Analysis of the chemical acid-base status of blood taken from the umbilical cord of an infant immediately after delivery provides information on any damage suffered by the infant due to lack of oxygen during labour. However, this process is complex and error prone, and requires expertise which is not always available on labour wards. A model of clinical expertise required for the accurate interpretation of umbilical acid-base status was developed, and encapsulated in a rule-based expert system. This expert system checks results to ensure their consistency, identifies whether the results come from arterial or venous vessels, and then produces an interpretation of their meaning. This 'crisp' expert system was validated, verified and commercially released, and has since been installed at twenty two hospitals all around the United Kingdom. The assessment of umbilical acid-base status is characterised by uncertainty in both the basic data and the knowledge required for its interpretation. Fuzzy logic provides a technique for representing both these forms of uncertainty in a single framework. A 'preliminary' fuzzy-logic based expert system to interpret error-free results was developed, based on the knowledge embedded in the crisp expert system. Its performance was compared against clinicians in a validation test, but initially its performance was found to be poor in comparison with the clinicians and inferior to the crisp expert system. An automatic tuning algorithm was developed to modify the behaviour of the fuzzy model utilised in the expert system. Sub-normal membership functions were used to weight terms in the fuzzy expert system in a novel manner. This resulted in an improvement in the performance of the fuzzy expert system to a level comparable to the clinicians, and superior to the crisp expert system. Experimental work was carried out to evaluate the imprecision in umbilical cord acid-base parameters. This information, in conjunction with fresh knowledge elicitation sessions, allowed the creation of a more comprehensive fuzzy expert system, to validate and interpret all acid-base data. This 'integrated' fuzzy expert system was tuned using the comparison data obtained previously, and incorporated vessel identification rules and interpretation rules, with numeric and linguistic outputs for each. The performance of each of the outputs was evaluated in a rigorous validation study. This demonstrated excellent agreement with the experts for the numeric outputs, and agreement on a par with the experts for the linguistic outputs. The numeric interpretation produced by the fuzzy expert system is a novel single dimensional measure that accurately represents the severity of acid-base results. The development of the crisp and fuzzy expert systems represents a major achievement and constitutes a significant contribution to the assessment of neonatal outcome.

en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipPlymouth Postgraduate Medical Schoolen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherUniversity of Plymouthen_US
dc.titleINTELLIGENT TECHNIQUES FOR HANDLING UNCERTAINTY IN THE ASSESSMENT OF NEONATAL OUTCOMEen_US
dc.typeDoctorateen_US
plymouth.versionFull versionen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


All items in PEARL are protected by copyright law.
Author manuscripts deposited to comply with open access mandates are made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the details provided on the item record or document. In the absence of an open licence (e.g. Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher or author.
Theme by 
@mire NV