Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKreutzmann-Gallasch, A
dc.contributor.authorSchroff, S
dc.date.accessioned2022-04-04T12:55:06Z
dc.date.issued2022-02
dc.identifier.issn0018-9855
dc.identifier.issn2195-0237
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10026.1/18995
dc.description.abstract

The presence of Amazon is ubiquitous, especially in the online bookstore and e-book market. The introduction of the “Kindle” further cemented Amazon’s dominant position and business model in the market, having negative implications for authors, publishers and consumers. Publishers have less control over setting the price to have access to Amazon’s customer base. This will affect the authors’ remuneration and attribution. On the other hand, Kindle users are locked-in consumers, limited to Amazon’s e-book offering. This not only affects consumer choice but also reinforces Amazon’s market power due to the significant network effects. The European Commission attempted to increase competition in the e-book market by banning most-favourite-nation clauses, but this has seemingly failed. This article advocates for enforcing the Kindle’s interoperability with the e-book formats of other e-book providers. The proposed approach is beneficial for publishers as well as consumers. It safeguards copyright aims while alleviating the contractual constraints imposed by Amazon. Furthermore, consumers would benefit from broader flexibility when using their Kindle, allowing them to store and read e-books from the provider of their choice.

dc.format.extent194-218
dc.format.mediumPrint-Electronic
dc.languageen
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherSpringer
dc.subjectArticle 102 TFEU
dc.subjectEU competition law
dc.subjectInteroperability
dc.subjectAbuse of dominance
dc.subjectAmazon
dc.subjecte-book
dc.titleA Case for Openness – Book Publishing and the Role of Amazon
dc.typejournal-article
dc.typeArticle
plymouth.author-urlhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35250047
plymouth.issue2
plymouth.volume53
plymouth.publisher-urlhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40319-022-01159-w
plymouth.publication-statusPublished
plymouth.journalIIC International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s40319-022-01159-w
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Arts, Humanities and Business
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Arts, Humanities and Business/School of Society and Culture
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA/UoA18 Law
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Users by role
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Users by role/Academics
dc.publisher.placeGermany
dcterms.dateAccepted2022-01-27
dc.rights.embargodate2022-4-5
dc.identifier.eissn2195-0237
dc.rights.embargoperiodNot known
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1007/s40319-022-01159-w
rioxxterms.licenseref.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2022-02
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


All items in PEARL are protected by copyright law.
Author manuscripts deposited to comply with open access mandates are made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the details provided on the item record or document. In the absence of an open licence (e.g. Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher or author.
Theme by 
Atmire NV