Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorTan, A
dc.contributor.authorNagraj, SK
dc.contributor.authorNasser, Mona
dc.contributor.authorSharma, T
dc.contributor.authorKuchenmüller, T
dc.date.accessioned2022-02-25T13:51:32Z
dc.date.issued2022-01-06
dc.identifier.issn1110-0591
dc.identifier.issn2522-8307
dc.identifier.other6
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10026.1/18856
dc.description.abstract

<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:sec> <jats:title>Background</jats:title> <jats:p>This overview aimed to synthesize existing systematic reviews to produce a draft framework of evidence-informed health priority setting that supports countries in identifying appropriate steps and methods when developing and implementing national research agendas.</jats:p> </jats:sec><jats:sec> <jats:title>Main body</jats:title> <jats:p>We searched Ovid MEDLINE<jats:sup>®</jats:sup> and the WHO Institutional Repository for Information Sharing from 2010 to 2020 for critical or systematic reviews that evaluated research priority setting exercises. We adapted the AMSTAR checklist to assess the quality of included reviews and used adapted frameworks for data extraction and analysis. The search resulted in 2395 titles, of which 31 were included. Populations included in the reviews typically involved patients, families and carers, researchers, clinicians, policymakers and research funders. The topics covered in the reviews varied from specific diseases or conditions, approaches for healthcare practice or research priority setting methods itself. All the included systematic reviews were of low or critically low quality. The studies were thematically grouped based on their main focus: identifying and engaging with stakeholders; methods; context; and health area.</jats:p> </jats:sec><jats:sec> <jats:title>Conclusion</jats:title> <jats:p>Our overview of reviews has reconfirmed aspects of existing frameworks, but has also identified new concepts for countries to consider while developing their national research agendas. We propose a preliminary framework for consideration that highlights four key phases: (1) preparatory, (2) priority setting, (3) follow-up phase and (4) sustainability phase, which have thirteen sub-domains to consider.</jats:p> </jats:sec>

dc.format.extent6-
dc.format.mediumPrint-Electronic
dc.languageen
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherSpringer Science and Business Media LLC
dc.subjectNational health research system
dc.subjectOverview of reviews
dc.subjectResearch agenda
dc.subjectResearch funding
dc.subjectResearch priority setting
dc.subjectResource allocation
dc.subjectSystematic review
dc.titleWhat do we know about evidence-informed priority setting processes to set population-level health-research agendas: an overview of reviews
dc.typejournal-article
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.typeReview
plymouth.author-urlhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35013662
plymouth.issue1
plymouth.volume46
plymouth.publication-statusPublished online
plymouth.journalBulletin of the National Research Centre
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s42269-021-00687-8
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Admin Group - REF
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Admin Group - REF/REF Admin Group - FoH
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Health
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Health/Peninsula Dental School
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA/UoA03 Allied Health Professions, Dentistry, Nursing and Pharmacy
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Research Groups
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Research Groups/Institute of Health and Community
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Research Groups/Institute of Translational and Stratified Medicine (ITSMED)
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Research Groups/Institute of Translational and Stratified Medicine (ITSMED)/CCT&PS
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Users by role
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Users by role/Academics
dc.publisher.placeGermany
dcterms.dateAccepted2021-12-16
dc.rights.embargodate2022-2-26
dc.identifier.eissn2522-8307
dc.rights.embargoperiodNot known
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1186/s42269-021-00687-8
rioxxterms.licenseref.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2022-01-06
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


All items in PEARL are protected by copyright law.
Author manuscripts deposited to comply with open access mandates are made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the details provided on the item record or document. In the absence of an open licence (e.g. Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher or author.
Theme by 
Atmire NV