Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKim, C-S
dc.contributor.authorRoh, Saeyeon
dc.contributor.authorSeo, Y-J
dc.date.accessioned2022-02-18T08:06:41Z
dc.date.issued2022-02-17
dc.identifier.issn2092-5212
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10026.1/18823
dc.description.abstract

This study aims to evaluate the extent of collaboration between shippers and shipping companies in South Korea. Bespoke cooperative and collaborative spirit indices (CCSIs) reflect the conceptual differentiation between cooperation and collaboration, as well as a more comprehensive conceptualisation. Shipping companies registered in South Korea returned 167 usable responses. CCSIs were developed through exploratory factor analysis weighting methods, and differences among CCSIs by vessel type and contract period were examined using multivariate analysis of variance. CCSIs indicate that powerful supply chain members resist two-way communication, mutuality, distributive fairness, and long-term relationships. This is one of the first studies to operationalise the key concepts of cooperation and collaboration in terms of the maritime industry, providing the basis for future research in other supply chains despite a single informant attribute. Based on the CCSI scores, managerial and political initiatives are discussed to reduce barriers to interaction and ameliorate the CCSI level between supply chain members. The research provides insights into the extent of cooperation and collaboration by initially establishing CCSIs in the maritime industry, which will support strategic approaches to supply chain members.

dc.format.extent84-98
dc.languageen
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherElsevier
dc.subject12 Responsible Consumption and Production
dc.titleDevelopment of collaborative spirit indices: The case of South Korea’s maritime industry
dc.typejournal-article
dc.typeJournal Article
plymouth.issue2
plymouth.volume38
plymouth.publication-statusPublished
plymouth.journalThe Asian Journal of Shipping and Logistics
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.ajsl.2022.01.001
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Arts, Humanities and Business
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Arts, Humanities and Business/Plymouth Business School
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA/UoA17 Business and Management Studies
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Users by role
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Users by role/Academics
dcterms.dateAccepted2022-01-28
dc.rights.embargodate2022-2-19
dc.rights.embargoperiodNot known
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1016/j.ajsl.2022.01.001
rioxxterms.licenseref.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2022-02-17
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


All items in PEARL are protected by copyright law.
Author manuscripts deposited to comply with open access mandates are made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the details provided on the item record or document. In the absence of an open licence (e.g. Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher or author.
Theme by 
Atmire NV