Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHawkes, M
dc.contributor.authorLane, Sarah
dc.contributor.authorRapkin, J
dc.contributor.authorJensen, K
dc.contributor.authorHouse, CM
dc.contributor.authorSakaluk, SK
dc.contributor.authorHunt, J
dc.date.accessioned2022-02-17T14:15:22Z
dc.date.available2022-02-17T14:15:22Z
dc.date.issued2022-01-09
dc.identifier.issn0269-8463
dc.identifier.issn1365-2435
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10026.1/18817
dc.description.abstract

<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p> <jats:list> <jats:list-item><jats:p>Despite widespread variation in life span across species, three clear patterns exist: sex differences in life span are ubiquitous, life span is commonly traded against reproduction, and nutrition has a major influence on these traits and how they trade‐off. One process that potentially unites these patterns is intralocus sexual conflict over the optimal intake of nutrients for life span and reproduction. If nutrient intake has sex‐specific effects on life span and reproduction but nutrient choice is genetically linked across the sexes, intralocus sexual conflict will occur and may prevent one or both sexes from feeding to their nutritional optima.</jats:p></jats:list-item> <jats:list-item><jats:p>Here we determine the potential for this process to operate in the decorated cricket <jats:italic>Gryllodes sigillatus</jats:italic>. Using the Geometric Framework for Nutrition, we restrict male and female crickets to diets varying in the ratio of protein to carbohydrates and total nutrient content to quantify the effects on life span and daily reproductive effort in the sexes. We then use inbred lines to estimate the quantitative genetic basis of nutrient choice in males and females. We combine the nutrient effects and genetic estimates to predict the magnitude of evolutionary constraint for these traits in each sex. Finally, we present male and female crickets with a much broader range of diet pairs to determine how the sexes actively regulate their intake of nutrients.</jats:p></jats:list-item> <jats:list-item><jats:p>We show that protein and carbohydrate intake have contrasting effects on life span and reproduction in the sexes and that there are strong positive intersexual genetic correlations for the intake of these nutrients under dietary choice. This is predicted to accelerate the evolutionary response of nutrient intake in males but constrain it in females, suggesting they are losing the conflict. Supporting this view, males and females regulate nutrient intake to a common nutrient ratio that was not perfectly optimal for life span or reproduction in either sex, especially in females.</jats:p></jats:list-item> <jats:list-item><jats:p>Our findings show that intralocus sexual conflict over the optimal intake of nutrients is likely to be an important process generating sex differences in life span and reproduction and may help explain why females age faster and live shorter than males in <jats:italic>G. sigillatus</jats:italic>.</jats:p></jats:list-item> </jats:list> </jats:p><jats:p>A free <jats:ext-link xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1365-2435.13995/suppinfo">Plain Language Summary</jats:ext-link> can be found within the Supporting Information of this article.</jats:p>

dc.format.extent865-881
dc.languageen
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherWiley
dc.subjectcarbohydrate
dc.subjectevolutionary constraint
dc.subjectgenetic correlation
dc.subjectnutritional geometry
dc.subjectprotein
dc.subjectsex-specific nutritional optima
dc.titleIntralocus sexual conflict over optimal nutrient intake and the evolution of sex differences in life span and reproduction
dc.typejournal-article
dc.typeJournal Article
plymouth.author-urlhttps://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000740538400001&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=11bb513d99f797142bcfeffcc58ea008
plymouth.issue4
plymouth.volume36
plymouth.publication-statusPublished
plymouth.journalFunctional Ecology
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/1365-2435.13995
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Science and Engineering
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Science and Engineering/School of Biological and Marine Sciences
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Users by role
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Users by role/Academics
dcterms.dateAccepted2021-12-06
dc.rights.embargodate2022-2-18
dc.identifier.eissn1365-2435
dc.rights.embargoperiodNot known
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1111/1365-2435.13995
rioxxterms.licenseref.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2022-01-09
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


All items in PEARL are protected by copyright law.
Author manuscripts deposited to comply with open access mandates are made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the details provided on the item record or document. In the absence of an open licence (e.g. Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher or author.
Theme by 
Atmire NV