Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBradwell, Hannah
dc.contributor.authorWinnington, Rhona
dc.contributor.authorThill, Serge
dc.contributor.authorJones, Ray B.
dc.contributor.otherFaculty of Health & Human Sciencesen_US

Companion robots are social robots often resembling animals with potential wellbeing benefits for older adults. However, some such devices have failed possibly through inappropriate design. Method: Questionnaires were completed by 113 participants at nine health and care events. Participants were predominantly relevant professionals. Participants approached our interaction station, interacted with eight companion robots or alternatives, then completed questionnaires; ranking aesthetic, behaviour, technology, feel and interaction features and estimating affordable price. Results: Features ranked highly were: interactive response to vocalisations and touch, huggable size, soft fur, variety of behaviours/sounds, realistic movements, eye contact with large cute eyes, being realistic, familiar, easy to use and possessing simulated warmth. Participants thought  −£225 was affordable. Conclusion: We contribute priority features for stakeholders to inform future developments. Contrasting unfamiliar embodiment of some devices, stakeholders support familiar, realistic aesthetics, with implications for enhanced acceptability, adoption and more consistent wellbeing outcomes.

dc.publisherUniversity of Plymouthen
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States*
dc.subjectsocial robots, robot pets, user-centred design, older adults, dementiaen_US
dc.titlePrioritising Design Features for Companion Robots Aimed at Older Adults: Stakeholder Survey Ranking Resultsen_US

Files in this item


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States

All items in PEARL are protected by copyright law.
Author manuscripts deposited to comply with open access mandates are made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the details provided on the item record or document. In the absence of an open licence (e.g. Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher or author.
Theme by 
Atmire NV