Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorDewhirst, A
dc.contributor.authorLaugharne, Richard
dc.contributor.authorShankar, Rohit
dc.date.accessioned2022-02-04T08:46:11Z
dc.date.available2022-02-04T08:46:11Z
dc.date.issued2022-03
dc.identifier.issn2056-4724
dc.identifier.issn2056-4724
dc.identifier.othere37
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10026.1/18642
dc.description.abstract

<jats:sec id="S2056472422000047_sec_a1"><jats:title>Background</jats:title><jats:p>There has been an increase in the development and application of serious games to support management of mental ill health, but their full impact is unclear.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec id="S2056472422000047_sec_a2"><jats:title>Aims</jats:title><jats:p>Evaluation of the current evidence of acceptability and effectiveness of serious games in improving mental health disorders.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec id="S2056472422000047_sec_a3" sec-type="methods"><jats:title>Method</jats:title><jats:p>A PRISMA-guided scoping review was conducted, using a predefined criteria and a relevant word combination on three databases: EMBASE, Medline and PsycINFO. Each included study was examined for game format, study type, number of participants, basic demographics, disorder targeted, recruitment, setting, control conditions, duration and follow-up, study attrition, primary outcomes and their results. Each study was given a Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations rating for quality.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec id="S2056472422000047_sec_a4" sec-type="results"><jats:title>Results</jats:title><jats:p>Fourteen out of 513 studies met the inclusion criteria. The serious games focused on symptoms of anxiety (<jats:italic>n</jats:italic>= 4), attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (<jats:italic>n</jats:italic>= 3), depression (<jats:italic>n</jats:italic>= 2), schizophrenia (<jats:italic>n</jats:italic>= 2), alcohol use disorder (<jats:italic>n</jats:italic>= 2) and bipolar disorder (<jats:italic>n</jats:italic>= 1). There were multiple significant outcomes favouring serious games across conditions covered in the review. Study quality varied, with studies rated high (<jats:italic>n</jats:italic>= 3), moderate (<jats:italic>n</jats:italic>= 6), low (<jats:italic>n</jats:italic>= 3) and very low (<jats:italic>n</jats:italic>= 2).</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec id="S2056472422000047_sec_a5" sec-type="conclusions"><jats:title>Conclusions</jats:title><jats:p>The available evidence suggests that serious games could be an effective format for an intervention to reduce mental health symptoms and improve outcomes of individuals. Better designed studies would further develop confidence in this area. This is a potential vehicle of change to deliver some of the much-needed psychiatric support to both economically developed and developing regions in a resource-utilitarian manner. Partnerships between the gaming industry, researchers and health services may benefit patients.</jats:p></jats:sec>

dc.format.extente37-
dc.format.mediumElectronic
dc.languageen
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherRoyal College of Psychiatrists
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.subjectSerious games
dc.subjectdepression
dc.subjectanxiety
dc.subjectschizophrenia
dc.subjectbipolar disorder
dc.titleTherapeutic use of serious games in mental health: scoping review
dc.typejournal-article
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.typeReview
plymouth.author-urlhttps://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000749544500001&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=11bb513d99f797142bcfeffcc58ea008
plymouth.issue2
plymouth.volume8
plymouth.publication-statusPublished
plymouth.journalBJPsych Open
dc.identifier.doi10.1192/bjo.2022.4
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Health
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Users by role
dc.publisher.placeEngland
dc.identifier.eissn2056-4724
dc.rights.embargoperiodNot known
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1192/bjo.2022.4
rioxxterms.licenseref.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International

All items in PEARL are protected by copyright law.
Author manuscripts deposited to comply with open access mandates are made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the details provided on the item record or document. In the absence of an open licence (e.g. Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher or author.
Theme by 
Atmire NV