Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorWilson, Olivia
dc.date.accessioned2022-01-21T13:02:30Z
dc.date.available2022-01-21T13:02:30Z
dc.date.issued2021-11-23
dc.identifier.issn0964-0568
dc.identifier.issn1360-0559
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10026.1/18602
dc.description.abstract

This article explores how international biodiversity commitments (Aichi targets) made in 2010 have been incorporated into spatial planning policy in England. The article analyses the moral, scientific and instrumental arguments underlying the Aichi targets and how they are reflected in the National Planning Policy Framework for England, together with views on the spatial planning approach to biodiversity expressed by local actors in spatial planning. The article concludes that biodiversity has been ‘mainstreamed’ in English spatial planning policy, but with spatial variations in policy approach between protected sites and the wider countryside and urban areas and with responsibility for biodiversity enhancement in the wider countryside and urban areas relying mainly on local policy and instrumental arguments that are likely to lead to tensions over the ‘replaceability’ of nature. The concept of connectivity is identified as key to a successful biodiversity strategy, but challenges to achieving connectivity in practice are identified.

dc.format.extent1-23
dc.languageen
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherRoutledge
dc.subjectbiodiversity
dc.subjectspatial planning
dc.subjectEngland
dc.subjectAichi targets
dc.subjectecological modernization
dc.titlePutting nature centre stage? The challenges of ‘mainstreaming’ biodiversity in the planning process
dc.typejournal-article
dc.typeJournal Article
plymouth.author-urlhttps://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000721755700001&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=11bb513d99f797142bcfeffcc58ea008
plymouth.issue3
plymouth.volume66
plymouth.publication-statusPublished
plymouth.journalJournal of Environmental Planning and Management
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/09640568.2021.1999219
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Science and Engineering
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA/UoA14 Geography and Environmental Studies
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Users by role
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Users by role/Academics
dcterms.dateAccepted2021-10-12
dc.rights.embargodate2022-1-22
dc.identifier.eissn1360-0559
dc.rights.embargoperiodNot known
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1080/09640568.2021.1999219
rioxxterms.licenseref.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2021-11-23
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


All items in PEARL are protected by copyright law.
Author manuscripts deposited to comply with open access mandates are made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the details provided on the item record or document. In the absence of an open licence (e.g. Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher or author.
Theme by 
Atmire NV