Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHenry, CJ
dc.contributor.authorSemova, G
dc.contributor.authorBarnes, E
dc.contributor.authorCotter, I
dc.contributor.authorDevers, T
dc.contributor.authorRafaee, A
dc.contributor.authorSlavescu, A
dc.contributor.authorCathain, NO
dc.contributor.authorMcCollum, D
dc.contributor.authorRoche, E
dc.contributor.authorMockler, D
dc.contributor.authorAllen, J
dc.contributor.authorMeehan, J
dc.contributor.authorKlingenberg, C
dc.contributor.authorLatour, Jos M
dc.contributor.authorvan den Hoogen, A
dc.contributor.authorStrunk, T
dc.contributor.authorGiannoni, E
dc.contributor.authorSchlapbach, LJ
dc.contributor.authorDegtyareva, M
dc.contributor.authorPlötz, FB
dc.contributor.authorde Boode, WP
dc.contributor.authorNaver, L
dc.contributor.authorWynn, JL
dc.contributor.authorKüster, H
dc.contributor.authorJanota, J
dc.contributor.authorKeij, FM
dc.contributor.authorReiss, IKM
dc.contributor.authorBliss, JM
dc.contributor.authorPolin, R
dc.contributor.authorKoenig, JM
dc.contributor.authorTurner, MA
dc.contributor.authorGale, C
dc.contributor.authorMolloy, EJ
dc.date.accessioned2022-01-10T09:05:54Z
dc.date.available2022-01-10T09:05:54Z
dc.date.issued2022-01-07
dc.identifier.issn0031-3998
dc.identifier.issn1530-0447
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10026.1/18536
dc.description.abstract

<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:sec> <jats:title>Background</jats:title> <jats:p>The lack of a consensus definition of neonatal sepsis and a core outcome set (COS) proves a substantial impediment to research that influences policy and practice relevant to key stakeholders, patients and parents.</jats:p> </jats:sec><jats:sec> <jats:title>Methods</jats:title> <jats:p>A systematic review of the literature was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. In the included studies, the described outcomes were extracted in accordance with the provisions of the Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials (COMET) handbook and registered.</jats:p> </jats:sec><jats:sec> <jats:title>Results</jats:title> <jats:p>Among 884 abstracts identified, 90 randomised controlled trials (RCTs) were included in this review. Only 30 manuscripts explicitly stated the primary and/or secondary outcomes. A total of 88 distinct outcomes were recorded across all 90 studies included. These were then assigned to seven different domains in line with the taxonomy for classification proposed by the COMET initiative. The most frequently reported outcome was survival with 74% (<jats:italic>n</jats:italic> = 67) of the studies reporting an outcome within this domain.</jats:p> </jats:sec><jats:sec> <jats:title>Conclusions</jats:title> <jats:p>This systematic review constitutes one of the initial phases in the protocol for developing a COS in neonatal sepsis. The paucity of standardised outcome reporting in neonatal sepsis hinders comparison and synthesis of data. The final phase will involve a Delphi Survey to generate a COS in neonatal sepsis by consensus recommendation.</jats:p> </jats:sec><jats:sec> <jats:title>Impact</jats:title> <jats:p><jats:list list-type="bullet"> <jats:list-item> <jats:p>This systematic review identified a wide variation of outcomes reported among published RCTs on the management of neonatal sepsis.</jats:p> </jats:list-item> <jats:list-item> <jats:p>The paucity of standardised outcome reporting hinders comparison and synthesis of data and future meta-analyses with conclusive recommendations on the management of neonatal sepsis are unlikely.</jats:p> </jats:list-item> <jats:list-item> <jats:p>The final phase will involve a Delphi Survey to determine a COS by consensus recommendation with input from all relevant stakeholders.</jats:p> </jats:list-item> </jats:list></jats:p> </jats:sec>

dc.format.extent735-742
dc.format.mediumPrint-Electronic
dc.languageen
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherSpringer Science and Business Media LLC
dc.subjectDelphi Technique
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectInfant, Newborn
dc.subjectNeonatal Sepsis
dc.subjectOutcome Assessment, Health Care
dc.subjectRandomized Controlled Trials as Topic
dc.subjectResearch Design
dc.subjectTreatment Outcome
dc.titleNeonatal sepsis: a systematic review of core outcomes from randomised clinical trials
dc.typejournal-article
dc.typeSystematic Review
dc.typeResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
plymouth.author-urlhttps://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000740156600003&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=11bb513d99f797142bcfeffcc58ea008
plymouth.issue4
plymouth.volume91
plymouth.publication-statusPublished
plymouth.journalPediatric Research
dc.identifier.doi10.1038/s41390-021-01883-y
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Health
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Health/School of Nursing and Midwifery
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA/UoA03 Allied Health Professions, Dentistry, Nursing and Pharmacy
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Research Groups
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Research Groups/Institute of Health and Community
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Research Groups/Plymouth Institute of Health and Care Research (PIHR)
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Users by role
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Users by role/Academics
dc.publisher.placeUnited States
dcterms.dateAccepted2021-10-28
dc.rights.embargodate2022-1-11
dc.identifier.eissn1530-0447
dc.rights.embargoperiodNot known
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1038/s41390-021-01883-y
rioxxterms.licenseref.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2022-01-07
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


All items in PEARL are protected by copyright law.
Author manuscripts deposited to comply with open access mandates are made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the details provided on the item record or document. In the absence of an open licence (e.g. Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher or author.
Theme by 
Atmire NV