Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorParkash, V
dc.contributor.authorAshwin, H
dc.contributor.authorSadlova, J
dc.contributor.authorVojtkova, B
dc.contributor.authorJones, G
dc.contributor.authorMartin, N
dc.contributor.authorGreensted, E
dc.contributor.authorAllgar, Victoria
dc.contributor.authorKamhawi, S
dc.contributor.authorValenzuela, JG
dc.contributor.authorLayton, AM
dc.contributor.authorJaffe, CL
dc.contributor.authorVolf, P
dc.contributor.authorKaye, PM
dc.contributor.authorLacey, CJN
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-11T13:39:42Z
dc.date.issued2021-06-30
dc.identifier.issn2398-502X
dc.identifier.issn2398-502X
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10026.1/18324
dc.description.abstract

Background: Leishmaniasis is a globally important yet neglected parasitic disease transmitted by phlebotomine sand flies. With new candidate vaccines in or near the clinic, a controlled human challenge model (CHIM) using natural sand fly challenge would provide a method for early evaluation of prophylactic efficacy. Methods: We evaluated the biting frequency and adverse effects resulting from exposure of human volunteers to bites of either Phlebotomus papatasi or P. duboscqi, two natural vectors of Leishmania major. 12 healthy participants were recruited (mean age 40.2 ± 11.8 years) with no history of significant travel to regions where L. major-transmitting sand flies are prevalent. Participants were assigned to either vector by 1:1 allocation and exposed to five female sand flies for 30 minutes in a custom biting chamber. Bite frequency was recorded to confirm a bloodmeal was taken. Participant responses and safety outcomes were monitored using a visual analogue scale (VAS), clinical examination, and blood biochemistry. Focus groups were subsequently conducted to explore participant acceptability. Results: All participants had at least one successful sand fly bite with none reporting any serious adverse events, with median VAS scores of 0-1/10 out to day 21 post-sand fly bite. Corresponding assessment of sand flies confirmed that for each participant at least 1/5 sand flies had successfully taken a bloodmeal (overall mean 3.67±1.03 bites per participant). There was no significant difference between P. papatasi and P. duboscqi in the number of bites resulting from 5 sand flies applied to human participants (3.3±0.81 vs 3.00±1.27 bites per participant; p=0.56).  In the two focus groups (n=5 per group), themes relating to positive participant-reported experiences of being bitten and the overall study, were identified. Conclusions: These results validate a protocol for achieving successful sand fly bites in humans that is safe, well-tolerated and acceptable for participants. Clinicaltrials.gov registration: NCT03999970 (27/06/2019)

dc.format.extent168-168
dc.format.mediumElectronic-eCollection
dc.languageen
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherF1000 Research Ltd
dc.subjectControlled human infection models; leishmaniasis
dc.subjectfocus groups
dc.subjectsand flies; public engagement
dc.subjectvaccines
dc.titleA clinical study to optimise a sand fly biting protocol for use in a controlled human infection model of cutaneous leishmaniasis (the FLYBITE study)
dc.typejournal-article
dc.typeJournal Article
plymouth.author-urlhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34693027
plymouth.volume6
plymouth.publication-statusPublished online
plymouth.journalWellcome Open Research
dc.identifier.doi10.12688/wellcomeopenres.16870.1
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Health
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Health/Peninsula Medical School
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA/UoA01 Clinical Medicine
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Research Groups
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Research Groups/Plymouth Institute of Health and Care Research (PIHR)
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Users by role
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Users by role/Academics
dc.publisher.placeEngland
dcterms.dateAccepted2021-06-30
dc.rights.embargodate2022-8-5
dc.identifier.eissn2398-502X
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.12688/wellcomeopenres.16870.1
rioxxterms.licenseref.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2021
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


All items in PEARL are protected by copyright law.
Author manuscripts deposited to comply with open access mandates are made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the details provided on the item record or document. In the absence of an open licence (e.g. Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher or author.
Theme by 
Atmire NV