Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMata, Fen
dc.contributor.authorPérez, LGen
dc.contributor.authorZhou, SMen
dc.contributor.authorChiclana, Fen
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-05T18:04:07Z
dc.date.available2021-11-05T18:04:07Z
dc.date.issued2014-03-01en
dc.identifier.issn0950-7051en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10026.1/18253
dc.description.abstract

A crucial step in group decision making (GDM) processes is the aggregation of individual opinions with the aim of achieving a "fair" representation of each individual within the group. In multi-granular linguistic contexts where linguistic term sets with common domain but different granularity and/or semantic are used, the methodology widely applied until now requires, prior to the aggregation step, the application of a unification process. The reason for this unification process is the lack of appropriate aggregation operators for directly aggregating uncertain information represented by means of fuzzy sets. With the recent development of the Type-1 Ordered Weighted Averaging (T1OWA) operator, which is able to aggregate fuzzy sets, alternative approaches to multi-granular linguistic GDM problems are possible. Unlike consensus models based on unification processes, this paper presents a new T1OWA based consensus methodology that can directly manage linguistic term sets with different cardinality and/or semantic without the need to perform any transformation to unify the information. Furthermore, the linguistic information could be assumed to be balanced or unbalanced in its mathematical representation, and therefore the new T1OWA approach to consensus is more general in its application than previous consensus reaching processes with muti-granular linguistic information. To test the goodness of the new consensus reaching approach, a comparative study between the T1OWA based consensus model and the unification based consensus model is carried out using six randomly generated GDM problems with balanced multi-granular information. When distance between fuzzy sets used in the T1OWA based approach is defined as the corresponding distance between their centroids, a higher final level of consensus is achieved in four out of the six cases although no significant differences were found between both consensus approaches. © 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

en
dc.format.extent11 - 22en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.titleType-1 OWA methodology to consensus reaching processes in multi-granular linguistic contextsen
dc.typeJournal Article
plymouth.volume58en
plymouth.publication-statusPublisheden
plymouth.journalKnowledge-Based Systemsen
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.knosys.2013.09.017en
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Health
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Health/School of Nursing and Midwifery
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA/UoA03 Allied Health Professions, Dentistry, Nursing and Pharmacy
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Users by role
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Users by role/Academics
dc.rights.embargoperiodNot knownen
rioxxterms.funderMedical Research Council
rioxxterms.identifier.projectDECIPHer: Centre for the Development and Evaluation of Complex Interventions for Public Health Improvement
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1016/j.knosys.2013.09.017en
rioxxterms.licenseref.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserveden
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen
plymouth.funderDECIPHer: Centre for the Development and Evaluation of Complex Interventions for Public Health Improvement::Medical Research Councilen
rioxxterms.funder.project90c9d09a-e7a2-43c5-a15f-a913c666761c


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


All items in PEARL are protected by copyright law.
Author manuscripts deposited to comply with open access mandates are made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the details provided on the item record or document. In the absence of an open licence (e.g. Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher or author.
Theme by 
@mire NV