Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBailey, JV
dc.contributor.authorBennett, KF
dc.contributor.authorGubijev, A
dc.contributor.authorSHAWE, JILL
dc.contributor.authorStephenson, J
dc.date.accessioned2021-10-19T09:32:12Z
dc.date.issued2021-01-01
dc.identifier.issn2055-2076
dc.identifier.issn2055-2076
dc.identifier.other205520762110334
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10026.1/18098
dc.description.abstract

<jats:sec><jats:title>Background</jats:title><jats:p> Online sexual health research can be convenient, efficient and low cost, but there are debates about the adequacy of online informed consent, privacy, and the acceptability of different methods of follow-up. </jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Objectives</jats:title><jats:p> To explore women's views and experiences of the Contraception Choices feasibility trial procedures and the place of digital interventions for contraception decision making. </jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Methods</jats:title><jats:p> We analysed data from two sources: (1) Qualitative interviews. Eighteen interviews were conducted with women who had taken part in the Contraception Choices pre-trial feasibility study, to evaluate recruitment and online trial procedures. (2) Free-text comments. Women in the main Contraception Choices randomised controlled trial were followed up at 3 and 6 months, and asked ‘Please tell us what you liked or disliked about the website’ and ‘Has being in the study had any good or bad effects on your life?’ A total of 387 and 414 comments were made at 3 and 6 months respectively. Data were analysed thematically. </jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results</jats:title><jats:p> Participants liked being involved in a study about contraception, although recruitment from an abortion clinic was less acceptable than in other sexual health settings. Women found the trial procedures straightforward, and expressed no major concerns about online self-registration, informed consent or online data collection. Online survey questions about contraception and fertility were acceptable, and participants liked the convenience of being followed up by email or text. </jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusions</jats:title><jats:p> Participants appreciated the advantages of the online research design and did not express concerns about consent or privacy. Women would welcome digital interventions for contraception in a variety of settings. </jats:p></jats:sec>

dc.format.extent205520762110334-205520762110334
dc.format.mediumElectronic-eCollection
dc.languageen
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherSAGE Publications
dc.subjectDigital health
dc.subjecteHealth
dc.subjectreproductive health
dc.subjectsexual health
dc.subjectwomen's health
dc.subjectqualitative
dc.titleParticipant views and experiences of sexual health research: The Contraception Choices online trial
dc.typejournal-article
dc.typeJournal Article
plymouth.author-urlhttps://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000694878100001&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=11bb513d99f797142bcfeffcc58ea008
plymouth.volume7
plymouth.publication-statusPublished
plymouth.journalDigital Health
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/20552076211033424
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Health
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Health/School of Nursing and Midwifery
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA/UoA03 Allied Health Professions, Dentistry, Nursing and Pharmacy
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Research Groups
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Research Groups/Institute of Health and Community
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Research Groups/Plymouth Institute of Health and Care Research (PIHR)
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Users by role
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Users by role/Academics
dc.publisher.placeUnited States
dcterms.dateAccepted2021-06-30
dc.rights.embargodate2021-10-20
dc.identifier.eissn2055-2076
dc.rights.embargoperiodNot known
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1177/20552076211033424
rioxxterms.licenseref.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2021-01-01
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


All items in PEARL are protected by copyright law.
Author manuscripts deposited to comply with open access mandates are made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the details provided on the item record or document. In the absence of an open licence (e.g. Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher or author.
Theme by 
Atmire NV