Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorJupe, S
dc.contributor.authorMaslin, Kate
dc.date.accessioned2021-10-14T11:18:01Z
dc.date.issued2021-02
dc.identifier.issn0952-3871
dc.identifier.issn1365-277X
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10026.1/18057
dc.description.abstract

<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:sec><jats:title>Background</jats:title><jats:p>Breast milk is the feed of choice for premature infants, although its nutritional composition is not always sufficient to meet their raised nutritional requirements. The addition of a multi‐nutrient breast milk fortifier (BMF) to breastmilk is recommended; however, international guidelines on the use of BMF are inconsistent. The present study aimed to explore the use of BMF in preterm infants by paediatric dietitians in the UK.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Methods</jats:title><jats:p>A questionnaire was designed and sent to members of the British Dietetic Association neonatal specialist group (<jats:italic>n</jats:italic> = 100) using a secure online platform. Descriptive statistics were calculated.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results</jats:title><jats:p>Forty dietitians completed the survey, all of whom used BMF. Local hospital BMF guidelines were available to 77.5% (<jats:italic>n</jats:italic> = 31). The most commonly used criteria for commencing BMF were: tolerating a feed volume of 150 mL kg<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup> day<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup> (72.5%, <jats:italic>n</jats:italic> = 29), a gestational age &lt;34 weeks (67.5%, <jats:italic>n</jats:italic> = 27) and a birth weight &lt;1500 g (60%, <jats:italic>n</jats:italic> = 24). The primary contraindication for the use of BMF was necrotising enterocolitis (NEC). The majority of respondents used standard fortification, with individualised fortification available to only 12.5% (<jats:italic>n</jats:italic> = 5). The most common indicators for discontinuing BMF were on discharge home (67.5%, <jats:italic>n</jats:italic> = 27), satisfactory growth (65%, <jats:italic>n</jats:italic> = 26) or feeding directly from the breast (62.5%, <jats:italic>n</jats:italic> = 25).</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusions</jats:title><jats:p>Although BMF is used more proactively in UK neonatal units than previously, variation in practice remains. Individualised fortification is very uncommon and caution remains regarding risk of NEC. The development of national guidelines on the use of BMF would help to standardise nutritional care in neonatal units.</jats:p></jats:sec>

dc.format.extent24-32
dc.format.mediumPrint-Electronic
dc.languageen
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherWiley
dc.subjectbreast milk fortifier
dc.subjectdietetic practice
dc.subjectneonatal
dc.subjectpreterm nutrition
dc.titleThe use of Breast Milk Fortifier in Preterm Infants by paediatric dietitians in the UK
dc.typejournal-article
dc.typeJournal Article
plymouth.author-urlhttps://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000583386600001&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=11bb513d99f797142bcfeffcc58ea008
plymouth.issue1
plymouth.volume34
plymouth.publication-statusPublished
plymouth.journalJournal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/jhn.12830
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Health
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Health/School of Nursing and Midwifery
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA/UoA03 Allied Health Professions, Dentistry, Nursing and Pharmacy
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Research Groups
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Research Groups/Plymouth Institute of Health and Care Research (PIHR)
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Users by role
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Users by role/Academics
dc.publisher.placeEngland
dcterms.dateAccepted2020-09-29
dc.rights.embargodate2021-10-15
dc.identifier.eissn1365-277X
dc.rights.embargoperiodNot known
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1111/jhn.12830
rioxxterms.licenseref.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2021-02
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


All items in PEARL are protected by copyright law.
Author manuscripts deposited to comply with open access mandates are made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the details provided on the item record or document. In the absence of an open licence (e.g. Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher or author.
Theme by 
Atmire NV