Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorTong, Aen
dc.contributor.authorSynnot, Aen
dc.contributor.authorCrowe, Sen
dc.contributor.authorHill, Sen
dc.contributor.authorMatus, Aen
dc.contributor.authorScholes-Robertson, Nen
dc.contributor.authorOliver, Sen
dc.contributor.authorCowan, Ken
dc.contributor.authorNasser, Men
dc.contributor.authorBhaumik, Sen
dc.contributor.authorGutman, Ten
dc.contributor.authorBaumgart, Aen
dc.contributor.authorCraig, JCen
dc.date.accessioned2021-09-28T10:42:34Z
dc.date.issued2019-12-28en
dc.identifier.other243en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10026.1/17964
dc.description.abstract

<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:sec> <jats:title>Background</jats:title> <jats:p>Research priority setting with stakeholders can help direct the limited resources for health research toward priority areas of need. Ensuring transparency of the priority setting process can strengthen legitimacy and credibility for influencing the research agenda. This study aims to develop a reporting guideline for priority setting of health research.</jats:p> </jats:sec><jats:sec> <jats:title>Methods</jats:title> <jats:p>We searched electronic databases and relevant websites for sources (frameworks, guidelines, or models for conducting, appraising, reporting or evaluating health research priority setting, and reviews (including systematic reviews)), and primary studies of research priority setting to July 2019. We inductively developed a list of reporting items and piloted the preliminary guideline with a diverse range of 30 priority setting studies from the records retrieved.</jats:p> </jats:sec><jats:sec> <jats:title>Results</jats:title> <jats:p>From 21,556 records, we included 26 sources for the candidate REPRISE framework and 455 primary research studies. The REporting guideline for PRIority SEtting of health research (REPRISE) has 31 reporting items that cover 10 domains: context and scope, governance and team, framework for priority setting, stakeholders/participants, identification and collection of priorities, prioritization of research topics, output, evaluation and feedback, translation and implementation, and funding and conflict of interest. Each reporting item includes a descriptor and examples.</jats:p> </jats:sec><jats:sec> <jats:title>Conclusions</jats:title> <jats:p>The REPRISE guideline can facilitate comprehensive reporting of studies of research priority setting. Improved transparency in research priority setting may strengthen the acceptability and implementation of the research priorities identified, so that efforts and funding are invested in generating evidence that is of importance to all stakeholders.</jats:p> </jats:sec><jats:sec> <jats:title>Trial registration</jats:title> <jats:p>Not applicable.</jats:p> </jats:sec>

en
dc.format.extent0 - 0en
dc.languageenen
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherSpringer Science and Business Media LLCen
dc.titleReporting guideline for priority setting of health research (REPRISE)en
dc.typeJournal Article
plymouth.issue1en
plymouth.volume19en
plymouth.journalBMC Medical Research Methodologyen
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s12874-019-0889-3en
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Admin Group - REF
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Admin Group - REF/REF Admin Group - FoH
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Health
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Health/Peninsula Dental School
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA/UoA03 Allied Health Professions, Dentistry, Nursing and Pharmacy
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Research Groups
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Research Groups/Institute of Health and Community
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Research Groups/Institute of Translational and Stratified Medicine (ITSMED)
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Research Groups/Institute of Translational and Stratified Medicine (ITSMED)/CCT&PS
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Users by role
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Users by role/Academics
dcterms.dateAccepted2019-12-17en
dc.rights.embargodate2021-09-29en
dc.identifier.eissn1471-2288en
dc.rights.embargoperiodNot knownen
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1186/s12874-019-0889-3en
rioxxterms.licenseref.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserveden
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2019-12-28en
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


All items in PEARL are protected by copyright law.
Author manuscripts deposited to comply with open access mandates are made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the details provided on the item record or document. In the absence of an open licence (e.g. Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher or author.
Theme by 
@mire NV