Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHunter, RMen
dc.contributor.authorAnderson, Ren
dc.contributor.authorKirkpatrick, Ten
dc.contributor.authorLennox, Cen
dc.contributor.authorWarren, Fen
dc.contributor.authorTaylor, RSen
dc.contributor.authorShaw, Jen
dc.contributor.authorHaddad, Men
dc.contributor.authorStirzaker, Aen
dc.contributor.authorMaguire, Men
dc.contributor.authorByng, Ren
dc.date.accessioned2021-09-20T12:56:43Z
dc.date.issued2021-08-05en
dc.identifier.issn1439-3972en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10026.1/17871
dc.description.abstract

<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:sec> <jats:title>Background</jats:title> <jats:p>People in prison experience a range of physical and mental health problems. Evaluating the effectiveness and efficiency of prison-based interventions presents a number of methodological challenges. We present a case study of an economic evaluation of a prison-based intervention (“Engager”) to address common mental health problems.</jats:p> </jats:sec><jats:sec> <jats:title>Methods</jats:title> <jats:p>Two hundred and eighty people were recruited from prisons in England and randomised to Engager plus usual care or usual care. Participants were followed up for 12 months following release from prison. The primary analysis is the cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained of Engager compared to usual care from a National Health Service (NHS) perspective with QALYs calculated using the CORE 6 Dimension. A cost-consequences analysis evaluated cross-sectoral costs and a range of outcomes.</jats:p> </jats:sec><jats:sec> <jats:title>Results</jats:title> <jats:p>From an NHS perspective, Engager cost an additional £2737 per participant (95% of iterations between £1029 and £4718) with a mean QALY difference of − 0.014 (95% of iterations between − 0.045 and 0.017). For the cost-consequences, there was evidence of improved access to substance misuse services 12 months post-release (odds ratio 2.244, 95% confidence Interval 1.304–3.861).</jats:p> </jats:sec><jats:sec> <jats:title>Conclusion</jats:title> <jats:p>Engager provides a rare example of a cost-utility analysis conducted in prisons and the community using patient-completed measures. Although the results from this trial show no evidence that Engager is cost-effective, the results of the cost-consequences analysis suggest that follow-up beyond 12 months post-release using routine data may provide additional insights into the effectiveness of the intervention and the importance of including a wide range of costs and outcomes in prison-based economic evaluations.</jats:p> </jats:sec><jats:sec> <jats:title>Trial registration</jats:title> <jats:p>(ISRCTN11707331).</jats:p> </jats:sec>

en
dc.languageenen
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherSpringer Verlagen
dc.titleEconomic evaluation of a complex intervention (Engager) for prisoners with common mental health problems, near to and after release: a cost-utility and cost-consequences analysisen
dc.typeJournal Article
plymouth.journalEuropean Journal of Health Economicsen
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s10198-021-01360-7en
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Health
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Health/Peninsula Medical School
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA/UoA03 Allied Health Professions, Dentistry, Nursing and Pharmacy
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Research Groups
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Research Groups/Community and Primary Care
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Research Groups/Institute of Health and Community
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Research Groups/Institute of Translational and Stratified Medicine (ITSMED)
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Research Groups/Institute of Translational and Stratified Medicine (ITSMED)/CCT&PS
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Users by role
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Users by role/Academics
dcterms.dateAccepted2021-07-29en
dc.rights.embargodate2021-09-21en
dc.identifier.eissn1618-7601en
dc.rights.embargoperiodNot knownen
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1007/s10198-021-01360-7en
rioxxterms.licenseref.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserveden
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2021-08-05en
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


All items in PEARL are protected by copyright law.
Author manuscripts deposited to comply with open access mandates are made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the details provided on the item record or document. In the absence of an open licence (e.g. Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher or author.
Theme by 
@mire NV