Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBanerjee, Sube
dc.contributor.authorJones, C
dc.contributor.authorWright, J
dc.contributor.authorGrosvenor, W
dc.contributor.authorHebditch, M
dc.contributor.authorHughes, L
dc.contributor.authorFeeney, Y
dc.contributor.authorFarina, Nicolas
dc.contributor.authorMackrell, S
dc.contributor.authorNilforooshan, R
dc.contributor.authorFox, C
dc.contributor.authorBremner, S
dc.contributor.authorDaley, S
dc.date.accessioned2021-09-17T12:07:24Z
dc.date.issued2021-07
dc.identifier.issn0885-6230
dc.identifier.issn1099-1166
dc.identifier.othergps.5532
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10026.1/17816
dc.description.abstract

<jats:title>ABSTRACT</jats:title><jats:sec><jats:title>Background</jats:title><jats:p>Traditional healthcare education typically focuses on short block clinical placements based on acute care, investigations and technical aspects of diagnosis and treatment. It may therefore fail to build the understanding, compassion and person‐centred empathy needed to help those with long‐term conditions, like dementia. Time for Dementia was developed to address this.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Method</jats:title><jats:p>Parallel group comparison of two cohorts of UK medical students from universities, one participating in Time for Dementia (intervention group) and one not (control group). In Time for Dementia students visit a person with dementia and their family in pairs for 2 hours three times a year for 2 years, the control group received their normal curriculum.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results</jats:title><jats:p>In an adjusted multilevel model (intervention group <jats:italic>n</jats:italic> = 274, control <jats:italic>n</jats:italic> = 112), there was strong evidence supporting improvements for Time for Dementia participants in: total Approaches to Dementia Questionnaire score (coefficient: 2.19, <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> = 0.003) and its person‐centredness subscale (1.32, <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> = 0.006) and weaker evidence in its hopefulness subscale (0.78, <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> = 0.070). There was also strong evidence of improvement in the Dementia Knowledge Questionnaire (1.63, <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> &lt; 0.001) and Dementia Attitudes Scale (total score: 6.55, <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> &lt; 0.001; social comfort subscale: 4.15, <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> &lt; 0.001; dementia knowledge subscale: 3.38, <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> = 0.001) scores. No differences were observed on the Alzheimer's Disease Knowledge Scale, the Medical Condition Regard Scale or the Jefferson Scale of Empathy.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Discussion</jats:title><jats:p>Time for Dementia may help improve the attitudes of medical students towards dementia promoting a person‐centred approach and increasing social comfort. Such patient‐focused programmes may be a useful complement to traditional medical education.</jats:p></jats:sec>

dc.format.extent1011-1019
dc.format.mediumPrint-Electronic
dc.languageen
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherWiley
dc.subjectAlzheimer&apos
dc.subjects disease
dc.subjectdementia
dc.subjecthealthcare education
dc.subjectLongitudinal Integrated Clerkships
dc.subjectlong&#8208
dc.subjectterm conditions
dc.subjectmultimorbidity
dc.subjectsenior mentorship programs
dc.titleA comparative study of the effect of the Time for Dementia programme on medical students
dc.typejournal-article
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.typeResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
plymouth.author-urlhttps://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000634111900001&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=11bb513d99f797142bcfeffcc58ea008
plymouth.issue7
plymouth.volume36
plymouth.publication-statusPublished
plymouth.journalInternational Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/gps.5532
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Health
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Health/Peninsula Medical School
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Health/Peninsula Medical School/PMS - Manual
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA/UoA03 Allied Health Professions, Dentistry, Nursing and Pharmacy
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Users by role
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Users by role/Academics
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Users by role/Researchers in ResearchFish submission
dc.publisher.placeEngland
dcterms.dateAccepted2021-03-04
dc.rights.embargodate2021-12-3
dc.identifier.eissn1099-1166
dc.rights.embargoperiodNot known
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1002/gps.5532
rioxxterms.licenseref.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2021-07
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


All items in PEARL are protected by copyright law.
Author manuscripts deposited to comply with open access mandates are made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the details provided on the item record or document. In the absence of an open licence (e.g. Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher or author.
Theme by 
Atmire NV