Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSchroff, Simone
dc.date.accessioned2021-08-18T06:39:45Z
dc.date.issued2021-11-27
dc.identifier.issn1747-1532
dc.identifier.issn1747-1540
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10026.1/17603
dc.description.abstract

The rationales for copyright protection have come under intense and sustained scrutiny over the last two decades. The debates are wide ranging and even challenge that copyright is a suitable tool to support the creative industries in their economic and cultural function. The result is politicization, stagnating reforms, stakeholder dissatisfaction and the notion that copyright policy is failing.

This article argues that the copyright aims need to be reassessed from an internal perspective rather than by relying on external normative benchmarks. It applies conventional content analysis to European Union (EU) copyright policy to identify the cross-institutional minimum consensus on what copyright aims to achieve, based on empirical evidence rather than theory.

The results show how EU copyright policy deviates from the theoretical and member state level debates. In particular, all aspects of copyright at EU level are shaped by the Single European Market, affecting the nature of copyright, its approach to challenges and the resolution of conflicts. The findings partially explain the evolution of copyright in the past, not least when reforms were met with stakeholder disapproval, and indicate which characteristics enhance a reform proposals chance of adoption in the future.

dc.format.extent1262-1272
dc.languageen
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherOxford University Press (OUP)
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.titleThe Purpose of Copyright- Moving beyond Theory
dc.typejournal-article
dc.typeJournal Article
plymouth.issue11
plymouth.volume16
plymouth.publisher-urlhttps://academic.oup.com/jiplp/advance-article/doi/10.1093/jiplp/jpab130/6444323
plymouth.publication-statusPublished
plymouth.journalJournal of Intellectual Property Law and Practice
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/jiplp/jpab130
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Arts, Humanities and Business
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Arts, Humanities and Business/School of Society and Culture
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA/UoA18 Law
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Users by role
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Users by role/Academics
dcterms.dateAccepted2021-11-04
dc.rights.embargodate2021-12-8
dc.identifier.eissn1747-1540
dc.rights.embargoperiodNot known
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1093/jiplp/jpab130
rioxxterms.licenseref.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2021-11-27
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International

All items in PEARL are protected by copyright law.
Author manuscripts deposited to comply with open access mandates are made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the details provided on the item record or document. In the absence of an open licence (e.g. Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher or author.
Theme by 
Atmire NV