Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMartin, Jen
dc.contributor.authorWilliamson, Den
dc.contributor.authorŁucznik, Ken
dc.contributor.authorGuy, JAen
dc.date.accessioned2021-08-10T15:49:13Z
dc.date.available2021-08-10T15:49:13Z
dc.date.issued2021-06-25en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10026.1/17552
dc.description.abstract

<jats:p>The EU H2020 RURITAGE project takes 20 case studies, considered to be Role Models (RMs) of successful heritage-led rural regeneration from Europe, to analyze them and transfer knowledge and learning to a network of Replicators (Rs). To quantify the success of these RURITAGE interventions, a monitoring framework has been developed which includes a range of Key Performance Indicators (KPI) and a co-monitoring program. This program takes a bottom-up approach working with key stakeholders to understand their values. The My Cult-Rural Toolkit described in this paper has been designed and developed to support the co-monitoring program. The toolkit includes various methods allowing expert and non-expert engagement with the landscape valuation process through embodied and situated approaches. All the co-monitoring tools share the principle of gathering data through real-time interaction in the place of interest, following principles of the embodied approach to ecosystems’ valuation. The toolkit employs both participatory hands-on workshops (Mini-Landscapes, Object Mapping, and Walking Maps) for in-depth understanding of values attached with landscape, and digital mobile apps (Rate my View App and Landscape Connect App) for exploratory, participatory mapping. This paper describes the toolkit and discusses benefits and limitations of its usage in the context of co-monitoring of cultural and natural heritage (CNH) inspired rural change.</jats:p>

en
dc.format.extent7128 - 7128en
dc.languageenen
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherMDPI AGen
dc.titleDevelopment of the My Cult-Rural Toolkiten
dc.typeJournal Article
plymouth.issue13en
plymouth.volume13en
plymouth.journalSustainabilityen
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/su13137128en
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Admin Group - R&I
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Science and Engineering
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Science and Engineering/School of Geography, Earth and Environmental Sciences
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/PS - Research & Innovation
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA/UoA13 Architecture, Built Environment and Planning
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Users by role
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Users by role/Academics
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Users by role/Professional Services staff
dcterms.dateAccepted2021-06-23en
dc.rights.embargodate2021-08-12en
dc.identifier.eissn2071-1050en
dc.rights.embargoperiodNot knownen
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.3390/su13137128en
rioxxterms.licenseref.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserveden
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2021-06-25en
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


All items in PEARL are protected by copyright law.
Author manuscripts deposited to comply with open access mandates are made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the details provided on the item record or document. In the absence of an open licence (e.g. Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher or author.
Theme by 
@mire NV