Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSellick, J
dc.contributor.authorLowther, Jason
dc.date.accessioned2021-08-09T11:28:48Z
dc.date.available2021-08-09T11:28:48Z
dc.date.issued2019-01-01
dc.identifier.issn1067-6058
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10026.1/17484
dc.description.abstract

Introduction. The offshore environment has been the focus of significant legal and policy interest over the past decade, as seen in the passing into law of the Marine and Coastal Access Act 2009 (MACAA) and the various regulatory bodies and mechanisms that were created pursuant to it. The instant case provides insight into the interaction between two of these mechanisms: marine licensing and the relationship with marine conservation zones. The case provides a thorough explanation of both the statutory frameworks at issue and the process of decision-making for the grant of a marine licence. An application to the Marine Management Organisation (MMO) to extract aggregate from the Goodwin Sands, an area noted for its unique benthic habitat, richness of species and extensive underwater cultural heritage, located seaward from the eastern coast of Kent, was made by one of the interested parties, the Dover Harbour Board. The grant of a licence to extract seabed aggregate in an area which was proposed as a marine conservation zone – with the absolute certainty that some of what would become the protected features of the marine conservation zone would be compromised – was the principal point of contention. The decision is interesting in that it appears to establish some parameters of what is acceptable such as, for example, the principle that damage to protected features of a marine conservation zone is permissible, and that the question, then, seemingly becomes one of degree.

dc.format.extent134-139
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherLawtext Publishing
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.titleMarine Licensing in Marine Conservation Zones: Thomson v Marine Management Organisation’
dc.typejournal-article
dc.typeNote
dc.typeJournal
plymouth.issue3
plymouth.volume31
plymouth.publication-statusPublished
plymouth.journalEnvironmental Law and Management
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Arts, Humanities and Business
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Arts, Humanities and Business/School of Society and Culture
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA/UoA18 Law
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Research Groups
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Research Groups/Marine Institute
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Users by role
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Users by role/Academics
dcterms.dateAccepted2020-04-15
dc.rights.embargoperiodNot known
rioxxterms.licenseref.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International

All items in PEARL are protected by copyright law.
Author manuscripts deposited to comply with open access mandates are made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the details provided on the item record or document. In the absence of an open licence (e.g. Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher or author.
Theme by 
Atmire NV