Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKonstantinou, A
dc.contributor.authorStokes, C
dc.contributor.authorMasselink, Gerd
dc.contributor.authorScott, Tim
dc.date.accessioned2021-08-09T11:18:36Z
dc.date.available2021-08-09T11:18:36Z
dc.date.issued2021-09-15
dc.identifier.issn0169-555X
dc.identifier.issn1872-695X
dc.identifier.other107828
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10026.1/17462
dc.description.abstract

Understanding the mechanisms and timescales required for beaches to recover from extreme storm events is fundamental for coastal management worldwide. Yet the post-storm recovery characteristics of different beach types have rarely been investigated over multi-annual timescales. Previous work along the southwest coast of England has suggested that the magnitude and alongshore variability of beach response to storms can be grouped into four key response types controlled by the level of exposure, angle of storm wave approach and degree of embaymentisation. This study aims to enhance our understanding of the spatial and temporal patterns of post-storm beach recovery within this storm response classification framework. Analysis was based on morphological survey data from 23 sites along the southwest coast of England collected between 2012 and 2017. We found that beaches that responded similarly to the unprecedented storm sequence of 2013/14, recovered in a similar manner too, and that spatio-temporal patterns of post-storm recovery can, for the most part, also be described by four coherent classes. In terms of complete recovery to pre-2013/14 volumes, 7 of the 23 beaches we studied recovered >90% of their sediment within 3 years or less, including some of the most affected sites. The magnitude of intertidal beach volume recovered (in the order of 1-100m3m-1) was well correlated with the storm erosion volume (R = -0.81, p = 0.00) and, importantly, was similar for beaches within the same response class. Fully exposed, cross-shore dominated beaches experienced the highest gross erosion and recovery volumes, but showed the lowest net recovery after 3 years (median: 74% volume recovered), while semi-exposed cross-shore dominated beaches showed lower gross change, but the highest net recovery (median: 93% volume recovered).In most cases, the spatial pattern of recovery mirrored that of the storm impact, regardless of whether the beach was cross-shore or alongshore dominant. The observed coherency within each of the four studied beach response classes indicates that regional monitoring programmes could make considerable cost savings by strategically targeting monitoring at representative sites within each class, rather than monitoring all beaches within a region.

dc.format.extent0-0
dc.languageen
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherElsevier BV
dc.subjectBeach recovery
dc.subjectStorm response
dc.subjectLiDAR
dc.subjectBeach classification
dc.subjectExtreme storms
dc.subjectGeomorphic change detection
dc.subjectCoastal management
dc.titleThe extreme 2013/14 winter storms: Regional patterns in multi-annual beach recovery
dc.typejournal-article
dc.typeJournal Article
plymouth.author-urlhttps://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000685970700001&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=11bb513d99f797142bcfeffcc58ea008
plymouth.volume389
plymouth.publication-statusPublished
plymouth.journalGeomorphology
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.geomorph.2021.107828
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Science and Engineering
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Science and Engineering/School of Biological and Marine Sciences
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA/UoA07 Earth Systems and Environmental Sciences
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Research Groups
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Research Groups/Marine Institute
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Users by role
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Users by role/Academics
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Users by role/Researchers in ResearchFish submission
dcterms.dateAccepted2021-06-06
dc.rights.embargodate2022-6-11
dc.identifier.eissn1872-695X
dc.rights.embargoperiodNot known
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1016/j.geomorph.2021.107828
rioxxterms.licenseref.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2021-09-15
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


All items in PEARL are protected by copyright law.
Author manuscripts deposited to comply with open access mandates are made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the details provided on the item record or document. In the absence of an open licence (e.g. Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher or author.
Theme by 
Atmire NV