Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorAlderton, Jen
dc.contributor.authorPratt, Nen
dc.date.accessioned2021-04-20T13:05:38Z
dc.date.issued2021-06-04en
dc.identifier.issn1750-8487en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10026.1/17055
dc.description18 month embargo applies.en
dc.description.abstract

Recent policy reforms to the national assessment system in England have altered the way in which teachers undertake assessment. Through an analysis of data from a small-scale interview study with eleven primary teachers in the south and east of England, we examine the ways in which teachers work with assessment software to monitor and track attainment. By employing a theoretical lens focusing on power and implementing an analytics of government, we illuminate the visualizing effects of whole class digital assessment grids. A prominent feature across the data set is the use of the language of ‘gaps’ in relation to the teaching and assessment of mathematics. We argue that digital assessment tools act as technologies of power and of the self which shape teachers’ practices, their identities, how they position children as learners, but also shape the nature of the subject of mathematics itself. It is important to better understand assessment software in education and the discourses in which it operates in order to recognise what is at stake for teaching, learning and curriculum.

en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherTaylor & Francis (Routledge)en
dc.subjectanalytics of governmenten
dc.subjectassessment softwareen
dc.subjectgapsen
dc.subjectgovernmentalityen
dc.subjectmathematics educationen
dc.titleFilling gaps: assessment software and the production of mathematics and its teaching and learning in primary schoolsen
dc.typeJournal Article
plymouth.journalCritical Studies in Educationen
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/17508487.2021.1917435en
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Arts, Humanities and Business
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Arts, Humanities and Business/Plymouth Institute of Education
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA/UoA23 Education
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Research Groups
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Research Groups/Institute of Health and Community
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Users by role
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Users by role/Academics
dcterms.dateAccepted2021-04-12en
dc.rights.embargodate2022-12-04en
dc.rights.embargoperiodNot knownen
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1080/17508487.2021.1917435en
rioxxterms.licenseref.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserveden
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2021-06-04en
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


All items in PEARL are protected by copyright law.
Author manuscripts deposited to comply with open access mandates are made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the details provided on the item record or document. In the absence of an open licence (e.g. Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher or author.
Theme by 
@mire NV