Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorAlderton, J
dc.contributor.authorPratt, Nicholas
dc.date.accessioned2021-04-20T13:05:38Z
dc.date.issued2021-06-04
dc.identifier.issn1750-8487
dc.identifier.issn1750-8495
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10026.1/17055
dc.description.abstract

Recent policy reforms to the national assessment system in England have altered the way in which teachers undertake assessment. Through an analysis of data from a small-scale interview study with eleven primary teachers in the south and east of England, we examine the ways in which teachers work with assessment software to monitor and track attainment. By employing a theoretical lens focusing on power and implementing an analytics of government, we illuminate the visualizing effects of whole class digital assessment grids. A prominent feature across the data set is the use of the language of ‘gaps’ in relation to the teaching and assessment of mathematics. We argue that digital assessment tools act as technologies of power and of the self which shape teachers’ practices, their identities, how they position children as learners, but also shape the nature of the subject of mathematics itself. It is important to better understand assessment software in education and the discourses in which it operates in order to recognise what is at stake for teaching, learning and curriculum.

dc.format.extent501-515
dc.languageen
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherTaylor & Francis (Routledge)
dc.subjectanalytics of government
dc.subjectassessment software
dc.subjectgaps
dc.subjectgovernmentality
dc.subjectmathematics education
dc.titleFilling gaps: assessment software and the production of mathematics and its teaching and learning in primary schools
dc.typejournal-article
dc.typeJournal Article
plymouth.author-urlhttps://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000657961600001&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=11bb513d99f797142bcfeffcc58ea008
plymouth.issue4
plymouth.volume63
plymouth.publication-statusPublished
plymouth.journalCritical Studies in Education
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/17508487.2021.1917435
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Arts, Humanities and Business
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA/UoA23 Education
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Research Groups
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Research Groups/Institute of Health and Community
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Users by role
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Users by role/Academics
dcterms.dateAccepted2021-04-12
dc.rights.embargodate2022-12-4
dc.identifier.eissn1750-8495
dc.rights.embargoperiodNot known
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1080/17508487.2021.1917435
rioxxterms.licenseref.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2021-06-04
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


All items in PEARL are protected by copyright law.
Author manuscripts deposited to comply with open access mandates are made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the details provided on the item record or document. In the absence of an open licence (e.g. Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher or author.
Theme by 
Atmire NV