Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorEdwards, K
dc.contributor.authorBradwell, Hannah
dc.contributor.authorJones, Ray
dc.contributor.authorAndrade, Jackie
dc.contributor.authorSHAWE, JILL
dc.date.accessioned2021-03-25T17:54:19Z
dc.date.issued2021-03-21
dc.identifier.issn0266-6138
dc.identifier.issn1532-3099
dc.identifier.other102995
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10026.1/16983
dc.description.abstract

BACKGROUND: Women experiencing gestational diabetes face challenges during and after pregnancy that could be supported with mobile health. Mobile health isn't routinely implemented and little is known regarding its use to aid information seeking, peer support and behaviour change. Understanding women's experiences of mHealth is critical to ensuring acceptance and use, particularly with relation to postpartum and interconception periods, where support is currently lacking. This study therefore aimed to explore the views and experiences of women with previous gestational diabetes, on using mHealth resources before, during and after pregnancy.Women's expectations for future mHealth were also explored. SETTING: Ten female participants from across the United Kingdom, experiencing GDM within the past five years, were convenience sampled from a group of individuals participating in a webinar. The webinar about technology to support GDM management was advertised online and all of those who registered were invited, via email, to take part. DESIGN: Women's views and experiences were explored using semi-structured telephone interviews. Audio recorded data were transcribed, coded and analysed using NVivo 12. Thematic analysis was used to analyse data, creating main and sub-themes. Data are presented in narrative form. PARTICIPANTS: Ten women living across the United Kingdom who had experienced gestational diabetes within the past five years, participated. FINDINGS: All ten women used mHealth, valuing social media for dietary information and peer support. Few mHealth resources were recommended by professionals and women discussed discontentment with the information they provided. Information found online was often valued over that provided by professionals. Some women used apps for behaviour change, but disliked certain features and poor engagement hindered their use. Women desired an app to overcome lack of motivation and prepare them for future healthy pregnancies. KEY CONCLUSIONS: Information provided to women by professionals was viewed as 'limited' and mHealth resources were rarely recommended. In response, women used social media to meet informational and emotional needs. Postpartum behaviour change is important to women and could be facilitated with tailored mHealth focused on increasing motivation. To maximise adoption and engagement future mHealth should be integrated with existing resources women value and be co-produced with professionals. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Current lack of engagement in mHealth for GDM by healthcare professionals means opportunities to influence or contest poor information are missed. We recommend increased participation by professionals to reduce opportunities for information miss-spread and reliance on peer driven information. Increasing digital confidence among professionals to support women navigate online spaces and take part in co-design is recommended.

dc.format.extent102995-102995
dc.format.mediumPrint-Electronic
dc.languageen
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherElsevier
dc.subjectGestational diabetes mellitus
dc.subjectmHealth
dc.subjectSocial media
dc.subjectQualitative research
dc.subjectInterviews
dc.subjectWomen's health
dc.titleHow do women with a history of gestational diabetes mellitus use mHealth during and after pregnancy? Qualitative exploration of women's views and experiences
dc.typejournal-article
dc.typeJournal Article
plymouth.author-urlhttps://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000654352300001&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=11bb513d99f797142bcfeffcc58ea008
plymouth.volume98
plymouth.publication-statusPublished
plymouth.journalMidwifery
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.midw.2021.102995
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Admin Group - REF
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Admin Group - REF/REF Admin Group - FoH
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Health
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Health/School of Nursing and Midwifery
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Health/School of Psychology
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA/UoA03 Allied Health Professions, Dentistry, Nursing and Pharmacy
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA/UoA04 Psychology, Psychiatry and Neuroscience
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA/UoA04 Psychology, Psychiatry and Neuroscience/UoA04 REF peer reviewers
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Research Groups
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Research Groups/Centre for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour (CBCB)
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Research Groups/Centre for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour (CBCB)/Cognition
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Research Groups/Institute of Health and Community
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Research Groups/Plymouth Institute of Health and Care Research (PIHR)
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Users by role
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Users by role/Academics
dc.publisher.placeScotland
dcterms.dateAccepted2021-03-18
dc.rights.embargodate2022-3-21
dc.identifier.eissn1532-3099
dc.rights.embargoperiodNot known
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1016/j.midw.2021.102995
rioxxterms.licenseref.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2021-03-21
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


All items in PEARL are protected by copyright law.
Author manuscripts deposited to comply with open access mandates are made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the details provided on the item record or document. In the absence of an open licence (e.g. Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher or author.
Theme by 
Atmire NV