Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorde Pennington, Nen
dc.contributor.authorMole, Gen
dc.contributor.authorLim, Een
dc.contributor.authorMilne-Ives, Men
dc.contributor.authorNormando, Een
dc.contributor.authorXue, Ken
dc.contributor.authorMeinert, Een

Background: Due to an ageing population, the demand for many services is exceeding the capacity of the clinical workforce. As a result, staff are facing a crisis of burnout from being pressured to deliver high-volume workloads, driving increasing costs for providers. Artificial intelligence, in the form of conversational agents, presents a possible opportunity to enable efficiencies in the delivery of care. Aims and Objectives: This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness, usability, and acceptability of Dora - an AI-enabled autonomous telemedicine call - for detection of post-operative cataract surgery patients who require further assessment. The study’s objectives are to: 1) establish Dora’s efficacy in comparison to an expert clinician, 2) determine baseline sensitivity and specificity for detection of true complications, 3) evaluate patient acceptability, 4) collect evidence for cost-effectiveness, and 5) capture data to support further development and evaluation. Methods: Based on implementation science, the interdisciplinary study will be a mixed-methods phase one pilot establishing inter-observer reliability of the system, usability, and acceptability. This will be done using using the following scales and frameworks: the system usability scale; assessment of Health Information Technology Interventions in Evidence-Based Medicine Evaluation Framework; the telehealth usability questionnaire (TUQ); the Non-Adoption, Abandonment and Challenges to the Scale-up, Spread and Suitability (NASSS) framework. Results: The results will be included in the final evaluation paper, which we aim to publish in 2022. The study will last eighteen months: seven months of evaluation and intervention refinement, nine months of implementation and follow-up, and two months of post-evaluation analysis and write-up. Conclusions: The project’s key contributions will be evidence on artificial intelligence voice conversational agent effectiveness, and associated usability and acceptability.

dc.publisherJMIR Publicationsen
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 Internationalen
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 Internationalen
dc.titleSafety and acceptability of a natural-language AI assistant to deliver clinical follow-up to cataract surgery patients: Proposal for a pragmatic evaluationen
dc.typeJournal Article
plymouth.journalJMIR Research Protocolsen
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Health
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Health/School of Nursing and Midwifery
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Users by role
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Users by role/Academics
dc.rights.embargoperiodNot knownen
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen

Files in this item


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International

All items in PEARL are protected by copyright law.
Author manuscripts deposited to comply with open access mandates are made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the details provided on the item record or document. In the absence of an open licence (e.g. Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher or author.
Theme by 
@mire NV