Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMultiple authors
dc.contributor.authorAfanador-Llach, Camila
dc.contributor.authorBerry, Anne
dc.contributor.authorCalvelli, John
dc.contributor.authorCoogan, Kristen
dc.contributor.authorDyer, James
dc.contributor.authorGale, Cathy
dc.contributor.authorGiangiulio, Anne M.
dc.contributor.authorHerrmann, Elizabeth
dc.contributor.authorLettis, Gwen
dc.contributor.authorSouza, Omari
dc.contributor.authorWood, Dave
dc.contributor.authorLee, Chae Ho
dc.contributor.authorNapier, Pamela
dc.contributor.authorMcMahon, Muireann
dc.contributor.authorde Eyto, Adam
dc.contributor.authorRutherford, Sarah
dc.date.accessioned2020-12-18T14:31:05Z
dc.date.available2020-12-18T14:31:05Z
dc.date.issued2020-12
dc.identifier.citation

Huus, Å., Ísleifsdóttir, D., Jones, P. and Squire, V. (eds.) (2020) Design Politics: What are the politics of your design and what is the design of your politics? Available at http://hdl.handle.net/10026.1/16761

en_US
dc.identifier.issn2732-4192
dc.identifier.issn2732-4206
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10026.1/16761
dc.description.abstract

In the Message journal issue 4 we wanted to create an arena where our discipline could discuss the nature and context of its role from an overtly political perspective.

Whilst we felt in our bones there was an appetite for this, we were far from certain about its nature, scope and size. Consequently, the call for Message 4 was, to say the least, somewhat of a gamble. Thankfully, our hunches and speculations seem to have been close to the mark. We received more submissions for this call than the previous three issues combined.

There was also an anticipation (albeit in hindsight a rather naive one) that some submissions might be positioned around conventional left, right and/or sustainable ecological perspectives. This did not really transpire. Nonetheless, we are very happy to say that the creative, eclectic and diverse nature of the responses has resulted in a range of exemplars that reflect the varied nature, concerns and foci of our vibrant discipline.

These extend from John Calvelli’s philosophical dialectic on the fundamental nature and origin of images, their use and effects, to Elizabeth Herrmann’s self-initiated craft-based approach, to do good locally and make a social contribution. Both of these papers are also examples of the higher than usual number of submissions from North America, a substantial proportion of which relate to the politics of cultural and/or racial identity, such as Omari Souza’s, ‘Racist Motifs in Everyday Branding’.

Message is dedicated to the development of Graphic Communication Design research. Particularly (although not exclusively) through authors’ analysis of and reflection on their own practice-based research.

Through peer reviewed submissions and occasional commissioned essays, Message explores, discusses and challenges the boundaries, roles, practices and outputs of Graphic Communication Design. Past, present and future.

en_US
dc.description.tableofcontents

Introduction

Peter Jones

Rethinking Graphic Design and the Design of Historical Arguments

Camila Afanador-Llach

The Intersection of Electoral Politics and Design Education

Anne Berry and Sarah Rutherford

Ecological Mourning and the Work of Graphic Communication Design

John Calvelli

From High to Low and High Again

Kristen Coogan

Speculative Graphic Design: The Idiot’s-Eye-View

James Dyer

Free!* Reclaiming ‘freedom’ from the neoliberal lexicon

Cathy Gale

Countering ‘Fake News’ in the Design Classroom

Anne M. Giangiulio

Cards for Humanity: Constructing Meaningful Communities Through Unsolicited Do-Good Design

Elizabeth Herrmann

Political Awareness and Engagement Through Banknote Design

Chae Ho Lee

Personal value thinking in graphic communication design education – The introduction of a clarification tool for students

Gwen Lettis, Pamela Napier, Adam de Eyto and Muireann McMahon

Passive, Brutish, or Civil? Racist Motifs in Everyday Branding

Omari Souza

Countering the Othering of Others: Illustration Facilitating Empathy

Dave Wood

Re-contextualising Illustration to Inform Sexual Consent – #JustSoYouKnow

Dave Wood

dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherUniversity of Plymouthen_US
dc.subjectPolitics, Graphic, Communication, Design, Research,en_US
dc.subjectDigital-humanities,en_US
dc.subjectEducation, Voting, Elections, Information-literacy, Social-impact, Critical-thinking,en_US
dc.subjectOntology, Epiphylogenesis, Neganthropocene, Sustainment,en_US
dc.subjectStyle-cycle, Fashion,en_US
dc.subjectSpeculation, Interpretation, Idiocy, Everyday-realism,en_US
dc.subjectPedagogy, Neoliberal, Lexicon,en_US
dc.subjectBorder-issues, USA-Mexico, Civic-engagement,en_US
dc.subjectLetterpress, Barter, Networking, Reciprocity, Craft, Business-models,en_US
dc.subjectActivity-Theory, Banknotes,en_US
dc.subjectValue-thinking, Sustainability,en_US
dc.subjectAdvertising, Branding, Politics, Race, Semiotics, Stereotypes,en_US
dc.subjectIllustration, Graphic-novels, Othering, Populism,en_US
dc.subjectRape-crisis, Sexual-consent,en_US
dc.titleMessage Journal, Issue 4: DESIGN POLITICS What are the politics of your design and what is the design of your politics?en_US
dc.title.html

Message Journal, Issue 4: DESIGN POLITICS What are the politics of your design and what is the design of your politics?



Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


All items in PEARL are protected by copyright law.
Author manuscripts deposited to comply with open access mandates are made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the details provided on the item record or document. In the absence of an open licence (e.g. Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher or author.
Theme by 
Atmire NV