Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorWang, Peijie
dc.contributor.authorLi, F
dc.date.accessioned2020-12-16T19:03:46Z
dc.date.available2020-12-16T19:03:46Z
dc.date.issued2021-01
dc.identifier.issn0040-1625
dc.identifier.other120386
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10026.1/16751
dc.description.abstract

Science, Technology and Innovation (STI) policy of Russia and China is studied in this paper from a policy foresight perspective and with regard to policy instruments, policy objectives, and policy implementation. A structural analytical framework is developed in this study specifically for STI policy analysis in these dimensions. Analyzing a database of 418 STI policies issued in the two countries, 25 policy variables have been scrutinized for the two countries vis-à-vis the three policy dimensions. The paper then maps and compares the two countries in STI policy instruments, objectives and implementation, adopting a positivist epistemology stance. Estimating a binary logistic model, Russia has been differentiated from China in their choice of policy instruments, their devotion to policy objectives and their approaches to policy implementation, revealing the differences and similarities between the two countries in the three STI policy dimensions. Deriving observable and corroborated evidence for STI policy perspectives in Russia and China, the results and findings help gain legitimate knowledge in this field.

dc.format.extent120386-120386
dc.languageen
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherElsevier BV
dc.subjectSexually Transmitted Infections
dc.titleScience, technology and innovation policy in Russia and China – Mapping and comparisons in objectives, instruments and implementation
dc.typejournal-article
dc.typeJournal Article
plymouth.issue0
plymouth.volume162
plymouth.publication-statusPublished
plymouth.journalTechnological Forecasting and Social Change
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120386
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Arts, Humanities and Business
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Arts, Humanities and Business/Plymouth Business School
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA/UoA17 Business and Management Studies
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Users by role
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Users by role/Academics
dcterms.dateAccepted2020-10-02
dc.rights.embargodate2022-4-22
dc.rights.embargoperiodNot known
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120386
rioxxterms.licenseref.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2021-01
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


All items in PEARL are protected by copyright law.
Author manuscripts deposited to comply with open access mandates are made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the details provided on the item record or document. In the absence of an open licence (e.g. Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher or author.
Theme by 
Atmire NV