Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorPan, W
dc.contributor.authorCai, S
dc.contributor.authorLatour, Jos M
dc.contributor.authorZhong, M
dc.contributor.authorLv, M
dc.contributor.authorLi, J
dc.contributor.authorZhang, X
dc.contributor.authorZhang, Y
dc.date.accessioned2020-11-03T14:18:42Z
dc.date.issued2020-11-24
dc.identifier.issn0309-2402
dc.identifier.issn1365-2648
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10026.1/16627
dc.description.abstract

<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:sec><jats:title>Aims</jats:title><jats:p>To evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of Mirabilite combined with Lactulose in older patients after abdominal surgery.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Design</jats:title><jats:p>It is a retrospective observational cohort study with a pre and post intervention group.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Methods</jats:title><jats:p>Medical records were retrospectively reviewed of postoperative Intensive Care patients with postoperative gastrointestinal tract dysfunction (aged &gt;60 years) in the Surgical Intensive Care Unit from January 2017–December 2018.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results</jats:title><jats:p>One hundred and sixty‐seven post‐surgical Intensive Care patients with postoperative gastrointestinal tract dysfunction were analysed; 74 patients received Mirabilite + Lactulose treatment and 93 patients received Lactulose treatment. The recovery rate of bowel sounds was better in the Mirabilite + Lactulose group (62.16%) compared with the Lactulose group (37.63%) after 3‐day treatment (<jats:italic>p</jats:italic> = 0.002) and the relative risk (RR) was 1.65 (95% CI, 1.20, 2.27). Moreover 70.27% patients in the Mirabilite + Lactulose group finally had flatus or defecation compared with 46.24% patients in Lactulose group (<jats:italic>p</jats:italic> = 0.003) and the RR was 1.52 (1.17, 1.98). The abdominal girth and Inter Abdominal Pressure in Mirabilite + Lactulose group showed significantly greater decrease over a 3‐day period compared with Lactulose group (4.86 vs. 3.46 cm, <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> = 0.027; 4.80 vs. 3.11 mmHg, <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> = 0.002 respectively). The pain score had greater decrease from the baseline in Mirabilite + Lactulose group than in Lactulose group (2.40 vs. 1.11; <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> &lt; 0.01). Patients in the Mirabilite + Lactulose group had shorter hospital stay than the Lactulose group 12.5 (<jats:italic>SD</jats:italic> 3.51) versus 13.9 (<jats:italic>SD</jats:italic> 5.14), <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> = 0.05.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusions</jats:title><jats:p>This study demonstrated that external use of Mirabilite combined with Lactulose can be considered as an easy intervention to improve postoperative gastrointestinal mobility in older intensive care patients who suffer from postoperative gastrointestinal tract dysfunction after surgery.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Impact</jats:title><jats:p>Our results provide a great option to alleviate the sufferings of postoperative patients. The externally use Mirabilite is a painless and safe interventions that is easy to implement by ICU nurses.</jats:p></jats:sec>

dc.format.extent755-762
dc.format.mediumPrint-Electronic
dc.languageen
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherWiley
dc.subjectintensive care
dc.subjectintra&#8208
dc.subjectabdominal surgery
dc.subjectMirabilite
dc.subjectnursing
dc.subjectpostoperative gastrointestinal mobility
dc.titleExternal Use of Mirabilite Combined with Lactulose Improves Postoperative Gastrointestinal Mobility among Older Patients Undergoing Abdominal Surgery
dc.typejournal-article
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.typeObservational Study
plymouth.author-urlhttps://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000591663400001&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=11bb513d99f797142bcfeffcc58ea008
plymouth.issue2
plymouth.volume77
plymouth.publication-statusPublished
plymouth.journalJournal of Advanced Nursing
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/jan.14640
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Health
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Health/School of Nursing and Midwifery
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA/UoA03 Allied Health Professions, Dentistry, Nursing and Pharmacy
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Research Groups
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Research Groups/Institute of Health and Community
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Research Groups/Plymouth Institute of Health and Care Research (PIHR)
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Users by role
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Users by role/Academics
dc.publisher.placeEngland
dcterms.dateAccepted2020-10-21
dc.rights.embargodate2021-11-24
dc.identifier.eissn1365-2648
dc.rights.embargoperiodNot known
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1111/jan.14640
rioxxterms.licenseref.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2020-11-24
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


All items in PEARL are protected by copyright law.
Author manuscripts deposited to comply with open access mandates are made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the details provided on the item record or document. In the absence of an open licence (e.g. Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher or author.
Theme by 
Atmire NV