Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorCottey, L
dc.contributor.authorRoberts, T
dc.contributor.authorGraham, B
dc.contributor.authorHorner, D
dc.contributor.authorStevens, Kara
dc.contributor.authorEnki, D
dc.contributor.authorLyttle, MD
dc.contributor.authorLatour, Jos M
dc.date.accessioned2020-11-02T13:44:27Z
dc.date.issued2020-11-02
dc.identifier.issn2044-6055
dc.identifier.issn2044-6055
dc.identifier.othere041485
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10026.1/16617
dc.description.abstract

<jats:sec><jats:title>Objectives</jats:title><jats:p>To determine the need for recovery (NFR) among emergency physicians and to identify demographic and occupational characteristics associated with higher NFR scores.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Design</jats:title><jats:p>Cross-sectional electronic survey.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Setting</jats:title><jats:p>Emergency departments (EDs) (n=112) in the UK and Ireland.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Participants</jats:title><jats:p>Emergency physicians, defined as any registered physician working principally within the ED, responding between June and July 2019.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Main outcome measure</jats:title><jats:p>NFR Scale, an 11-item self-administered questionnaire that assesses how work demands affect intershift recovery.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results</jats:title><jats:p>The median NFR Score for all 4247 eligible, consented participants with a valid NFR Score was 70.0 (95% CI: 65.5 to 74.5), with an IQR of 45.5–90.0. A linear regression model indicated statistically significant associations between gender, health conditions, type of ED, clinical grade, access to annual and study leave, and time spent working out-of-hours. Groups including male physicians, consultants, general practitioners (GPs) within the ED, those working in paediatric EDs and those with no long-term health condition or disability had a lower NFR Score. After adjusting for these characteristics, the NFR Score increased by 3.7 (95% CI: 0.3 to 7.1) and 6.43 (95% CI: 2.0 to 10.8) for those with difficulty accessing annual and study leave, respectively. Increased percentage of out-of-hours work increased NFR Score almost linearly: 26%–50% out-of-hours work=5.7 (95% CI: 3.1 to 8.4); 51%–75% out-of-hours work=10.3 (95% CI: 7.6 to 13.0); 76%–100% out-of-hours work=14.5 (95% CI: 11.0 to 17.9).</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusion</jats:title><jats:p>Higher NFR scores were observed among emergency physicians than reported in any other profession or population to date. While out-of-hours working is unavoidable, the linear relationship observed suggests that any reduction may result in NFR improvement. Evidence-based strategies to improve well-being such as proportional out-of-hours working and improved access to annual and study leave should be carefully considered and implemented where feasible.</jats:p></jats:sec>

dc.format.extent0-0
dc.format.mediumElectronic
dc.languageen
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherBMJ Publishing Group
dc.subjectaccident &amp
dc.subjectemergency medicine
dc.subjecthealth services administration &amp
dc.subjectmanagement
dc.subjecthuman resource management
dc.subjectorganisation of health services
dc.subjectoccupational &amp
dc.subjectindustrial medicine
dc.titleNeed for recovery amongst emergency physicians in the UK and Ireland: a cross-sectional survey
dc.typejournal-article
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.typeResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
plymouth.author-urlhttps://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000584947700001&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=11bb513d99f797142bcfeffcc58ea008
plymouth.issue11
plymouth.volume10
plymouth.publication-statusPublished
plymouth.journalBMJ Open
dc.identifier.doi10.1136/bmjopen-2020-041485
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Health
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Health/School of Nursing and Midwifery
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA/UoA03 Allied Health Professions, Dentistry, Nursing and Pharmacy
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Research Groups
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Research Groups/Institute of Health and Community
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Research Groups/Plymouth Institute of Health and Care Research (PIHR)
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Users by role
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Users by role/Academics
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Users by role/Researchers in ResearchFish submission
dc.publisher.placeEngland
dcterms.dateAccepted2020-09-21
dc.rights.embargodate2020-11-3
dc.identifier.eissn2044-6055
dc.rights.embargoperiodNot known
rioxxterms.funderNational Institute for Health Research
rioxxterms.identifier.projectNIHR Academic Clinical Fellowship
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1136/bmjopen-2020-041485
rioxxterms.licenseref.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2020-11-02
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review
plymouth.funderNIHR Academic Clinical Fellowship::National Institute for Health Research


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


All items in PEARL are protected by copyright law.
Author manuscripts deposited to comply with open access mandates are made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the details provided on the item record or document. In the absence of an open licence (e.g. Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher or author.
Theme by 
Atmire NV