Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBacon, Alison
dc.contributor.authorCorr, PJ
dc.date.accessioned2020-10-27T12:14:50Z
dc.date.issued2020-11-26
dc.identifier.issn1664-1078
dc.identifier.issn1664-1078
dc.identifier.other566237
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10026.1/16602
dc.descriptionEmbargo removed due to subject matter.
dc.description.abstract

Behavioural immune system (BIS) describes psychological mechanisms that detect cues to infectious pathogens in the immediate environment, trigger disease-relevant responses and facilitate behavioural avoidance/escape. BIS activation elicits a perceived vulnerability to disease (PVD) which can result in conformity with social norms. However, a response to superficial cues can result in aversive responses to people that pose no actual threat, leading to an aversion to unfamiliar others, and likelihood of prejudice. Pathogen-neutralizing behaviours, therefore, have implications for social interaction as well as illness behaviours and responses to health communications. In this study, we investigate how PVD influences conformity, attitudes to other people and to lockdown regulations through the lens of the Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory (RST). RST describes personality in terms of biologically-driven approach and avoidance motivations which support personal goals. Participants from the UK public (N = 605) completed an RST personality questionnaire and then read either (a) coronavirus morbidity-mortality statistics and current UK government lifestyle regulations, (b) just the regulations (as presented in most government publicity materials), or (c) no information at all. They all completed the Perceived Vulnerability to Disease scale to assess BIS-relevant Germ Aversion and Perceived Infectability, followed by questions measuring social conformity, warmth towards others and attitudes towards lockdown measures. Significantly lower PVD scores were observed in the no-information condition, with the other conditions showing no difference. In terms of RST, approach behaviours related to goal-drive persistence work alongside fear in explaining conformity to social norms. Reward related approach behaviours partially explained warmth towards others, indicating that social rewards gained through interaction continue to be strong drivers of behaviour. We found no role for RST traits in attitudes towards lockdown. Overall, coronavirus-related behaviour is not driven purely by fear, but also by social and/or protection goals regulated by approach motivation. This study presents new insights into public perceptions of coronavirus and government regulated lifestyle restrictions, helping to explain social behaviours in terms of biologically driven mechanisms. Such understanding is vital if we are to successfully motivate public behaviour to constrain spread of the virus.

dc.format.extent566237-
dc.format.mediumElectronic-eCollection
dc.languageeng
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherFrontiers Media
dc.subjectreinforcement sensitivity theory (RST)
dc.subjectCOVID-19
dc.subjectcoronavirus
dc.subjectperceived vulnerability to disease (PVD)
dc.subjectbehavioral immune system
dc.subjectconformity
dc.titleBehavioural Immune System responses to coronavirus: a Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory explanation of conformity, warmth towards others and attitudes towards lockdown
dc.typejournal-article
dc.typeJournal Article
plymouth.author-urlhttps://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000597663700001&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=11bb513d99f797142bcfeffcc58ea008
plymouth.issue11
plymouth.volume11
plymouth.publication-statusPublished online
plymouth.journalFrontiers in Psychology
dc.identifier.doi10.3389/fpsyg.2020.566237
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Health
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Health/School of Psychology
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA/UoA04 Psychology, Psychiatry and Neuroscience
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA/UoA04 Psychology, Psychiatry and Neuroscience/UoA04 REF peer reviewers
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Research Groups
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Research Groups/Centre for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour (CBCB)
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Research Groups/Centre for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour (CBCB)/Behaviour
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Research Groups/Plymouth Institute of Health and Care Research (PIHR)
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Users by role
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Users by role/Academics
dc.publisher.placeSwitzerland
dcterms.dateAccepted2020-10-27
dc.rights.embargodate2020-11-27
dc.identifier.eissn1664-1078
dc.rights.embargoperiodNot known
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.3389/fpsyg.2020.566237
rioxxterms.licenseref.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2020-11-26
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


All items in PEARL are protected by copyright law.
Author manuscripts deposited to comply with open access mandates are made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the details provided on the item record or document. In the absence of an open licence (e.g. Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher or author.
Theme by 
Atmire NV